From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Srebnik v. Dean

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01086-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01086-WYD-MJW.

February 3, 2006


PROTECTIVE ORDER


This Protective Order ("Protective Order") is entered into between Plaintiffs Charles Srebnik, Joann Srebnik, Michelle Srebnik, Lee Srebnik, Gary Devonport, Aimee Devonport, Allison Okon, Individually, and as Trustee For The Matthew Okon Trust (collectively "Plaintiffs") and Defendants Miller Diversified Corporation, Miller Feedlots, Inc., Norman M. Dean, James E. Miller, Clark A. Miller, Anderson Whitney, P.C., Comiskey Company, Professional Corporation and Sherman Howard, LLC (collectively "Defendants") on the date entered by the Court.

The parties have requested that a protective order be entered safeguarding the confidentiality of certain documents, before producing or allowing the production of these documents in this case. By production of its confidential documents or providing testimony pursuant to this order, the parties do not waive, but rather expressly reserve any and all legal rights, obligations, privileges, or immunities applicable to such documents and any corresponding testimony.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. The parties shall indicate that certain documents requested from them are to be protected by this Protective Order by stamping the legend "Subject to Protective Order" or "Confidential" on every page of the documents so designated. Except as may otherwise be provided by this Protective Order or by order of the Court, documents so designated (the "Documents") shall be used solely for purposes of this proceeding and may be disclosed only to (a) the parties to this proceeding and their officers, directors, employees, and affiliates; (b) counsel of record in this proceeding, and persons regularly employed in offices of such counsel and advisors; (c) witnesses or prospective witnesses, to the extent necessary for the preparation of such witnesses, and to the counsel representing such witnesses in connection with this proceeding; and (d) experts or consultants, if any, the parties retain to assist in the proceeding, to the extent such disclosure is deemed necessary by counsel in order for an expert or consultant to render his or her advice or opinions.

2. Any person being given access to Documents shall, prior to being given such access, be advised of the terms of this Protective Order and shall thereby become subject to such terms, including, without limitation, the provision that such Documents may not be disclosed other than as described in Paragraph I above and shall be used solely for the purposes of this proceeding.

3. Counsel for the parties, and any person designated under Paragraph 1, shall not reveal or disclose or make available the Documents or any information contained therein, to any unauthorized person, except as provided herein or as required to be disclosed by law. The Documents shall be used only for purposes of prosecuting and defending this proceeding and for no other purpose whatsoever. Counsel for the parties shall exercise reasonable care to ensure that when the Documents are used for the purposes permitted hereunder, the circumstances of such use do not reveal the content of the Documents to any unauthorized person.

4. Any party to this proceeding may at any time notify the other parties to this proceeding in writing of its objection that one or more of the Documents designated as confidential are not entitled to protection under the terms of this Protective Order. The parties shall first confer in a good faith attempt to resolve such dispute. If such attempt fails to resolve the dispute, the party making the objection shall thereupon have the right to apply to the Court for a ruling terminating the designation. Documents designated as confidential shall retain their confidential status until such time as the parties expressly agree otherwise in writing or the Court determines otherwise.

5. The provisions of this Protective Order shall continue in effect unless or until expressly released by all parties, or ordered by the Court.

6. Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar or otherwise restrict any attorney herein from rendering advice to his or her client with respect to this proceeding and, in the course thereof, referring to or relying upon information in the Documents.

7. Nothing in this Protective Order shall bar the disclosure of Documents by any party: (a) to the United States government, any state or local government, or any administrative body or instrumentality of any of the foregoing, or (b) as otherwise required to be disclosed by law, rule or regulation or in response to a subpoena; provided that prior to such disclosure, the party(ies) intending to make disclosure shall give the other party(ies) five (5) days prior written notice of the intended disclosure

8. This Protective Order may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be considered the same as if a single document shall have been executed, but shall become effective when entered by the Court.


Summaries of

Srebnik v. Dean

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 3, 2006
Civil Action No. 05-cv-01086-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Srebnik v. Dean

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SREBNIK, JOANN SREBNIK, MICHELLE SREBNIK, LEE SREBNIK, GARY…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 3, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 05-cv-01086-WYD-MJW (D. Colo. Feb. 3, 2006)