From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sragow v. Distilled Brands, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1948
274 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)

Opinion

October 11, 1948.


In an action to recover compensation, by a salesman whose terms and conditions of employment were governed by a contract entered into between the employer and the union of which the salesman was a member, order granting in part and denying in part defendant's motion for summary judgment or partial summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P.J., Johnston, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the order and to grant the motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that on the conceded facts the contract provisions are a bar to the action. [See post, p. 944.]


Summaries of

Sragow v. Distilled Brands, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 11, 1948
274 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)
Case details for

Sragow v. Distilled Brands, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD SRAGOW, Respondent, v. DISTILLED BRANDS, INC., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 11, 1948

Citations

274 App. Div. 898 (N.Y. App. Div. 1948)