Opinion
Case No. SC03-256.
June 2, 2003. Rehearing Denied September 8, 2003.
Lower Tribunal No. 5D01-2656
The Petitioner's petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla. 2000) (to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, the petitioner must have a clear legal right to the requested relief, the respondent must have an indisputable legal duty to perform the requested action, and the petitioner must have no other adequate remedy available); Migliore v. City of Lauderhill, 415 So.2d 62, 63 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), (mandamus is not an appropriate vehicle for review of a merely erroneous decision), approved, 431 So.2d 986 (Fla. 1983).
WELLS, PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE and BELL, JJ., concur.