From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Squalls v. Donahoe

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 5, 2015
601 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-2490

05-05-2015

Kim C. Squalls Plaintiff - Appellant v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General Defendant - Appellee Gina Dudley; Mark H. Anderson; John Doe; Jane Doe Defendants


Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis [Unpublished] Before BYE, COLLOTON, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

Kim Squalls appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary judgment in her action asserting claims under Title VII and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Upon careful de novo review, see Torgerson v. City of Rochester, 643 F.3d 1031, 1042, 1049-50 (8th Cir. 2011) (en banc) (standard of review; discussing legal standards), we conclude that the district court did not err in its summary judgment decision, see Gibson v. Am. Greetings Corp., 670 F.3d 844, 852-55 (8th Cir. 2012) (affirming grant of summary judgment in Title VII action; discussing pretext); Rahlf v. Mo-Tech Corp., Inc., 642 F.3d 633, 636-40 (8th Cir. 2011) (affirming grant of summary judgment in ADEA action; discussing pretext).

The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


Summaries of

Squalls v. Donahoe

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit
May 5, 2015
601 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Squalls v. Donahoe

Case Details

Full title:Kim C. Squalls Plaintiff - Appellant v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster…

Court:United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

Date published: May 5, 2015

Citations

601 F. App'x 457 (8th Cir. 2015)