From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

SPY Optic Inc. v. The Individuals

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Mar 22, 2022
No. 21-CV-62472-RAR (S.D. Fla. Mar. 22, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-62472-RAR

03-22-2022

SPY OPTIC INC., Plaintiff, v. THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES, AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE “A, ” Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT

RODOLFO A. RUIZ II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Final Default Judgment [ECF No. 35] (“Motion”). Plaintiff Spy Optic, Inc. seeks entry of a default final judgment against Defendants, the Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations identified on Schedule “A” that operate commercial Internet websites and/or e-commerce stores that infringe Plaintiff's trademarks and promote and sell counterfeit goods bearing and/or using Plaintiff's trademarks. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35]. Plaintiff requests the Court: (1) enjoin Defendants from producing or selling goods that infringe on its trademarks; (2) disable, or at Plaintiff's election, transfer the domain names at issue to Plaintiff; (3) assign all rights, title, and interest, to the domain names to Plaintiff and permanently delist or deindex the domain names from any Internet search engines; (4) remove the listings and associated images of goods bearing and/or using counterfeits and infringements of Plaintiff's trademarks at issue, and the goods of each Defendant bearing one or more of Plaintiff's trademarks held by the Internet marketplaces be surrendered to Plaintiff; and (5) award statutory damages. See generally id.

A Clerk's Default [ECF No. 31] was entered against Defendants on March 10, 2022, after Defendants failed to respond to the Amended Complaint [ECF No. 19], despite having been served. See Proof of Service [ECF No. 29]. The Court having considered the record and noting no opposition to Plaintiff's Motion, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED for the reasons stated herein. Pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a default final judgment will be entered by separate order.

BACKGROUND ]

The factual background is taken from Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, Motion, and supporting Declarations submitted by Plaintiff.

A. Factual Background

Plaintiff is the owner of the following trademarks, which are valid and registered on the Principal Register of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“Spy Optic Marks”):

Trademark

Registration Number

Registration Date

Class / Goods

SPY

1, 981, 513

June 18, 1996

IC 009. Glasses and sunglasses.

SCOOP

2, 146, 655

March 24, 1998

IC 009. Sunglasses.

J L

2, 157, 268

March 12, 1998

IC 009. Sunglasses.

LOGAN

3, 489, 694

August 19, 2008

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY

3, 750, 166

February 16, 2010

IC 035. Retail store services and online retail store services featuring sunglasses, sports goggles, and wearing apparel.

TRON

3, 981, 518

June 21, 2011

IC 009. Sunglasses.

HAPPY LENS

4, 463, 426

January 7, 2014

IC 009: Lens used in glasses, sunglasses, and goggles.

MCCOY

4, 538, 368

May 27, 2014

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY GLASSES

4, 805, 274

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY LOGAN

4, 805, 275

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY DOOM

4, 805, 277

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY HELM

4, 805, 292

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY TOURING

4, 805, 293

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

SPY FLYNN

4, 805, 294

September 1, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses.

sfy*

4, 859, 917

November 24, 2015

IC 009. Sunglasses; protective goggles for use in motorcycling, skiing, snowboarding, and biking.

SPY DISCORD

4, 914, 603

March 8, 2016

IC 009. Sunglasses.

DISCORD

4, 919, 079

March 15, 2016

IC 009. Sunglasses.

See Decl. of Damon Cook (“Cook Decl.”) [ECF No. 6-2] ¶ 5. The Spy Optic Marks are used in connection with the development, manufacture, and distribution of high-quality goods in the categories identified above. See id. ¶¶ 4-5.

Plaintiff's representative reviewed and visually inspected the detailed web page captures and photographs reflecting various products bearing Plaintiff's trademarks offered for sale through the commercial Internet websites and/or e-commerce stores operating under Defendants' domain names and seller identification names identified on Schedule “A” (“Subject Domain Names and Seller IDs”) and determined the products were non-genuine, unauthorized versions of Plaintiff's products. See Id. ¶¶ 14-15. Based on its investigation, Plaintiff alleges Defendants have advertised, promoted, offered for sale, or sold goods bearing and/or using what Plaintiff has determined to be counterfeits, infringements, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See id.; Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8-14, 24. Defendants are not now, nor have they ever been, authorized or licensed to use, reproduce, or make counterfeits, reproductions, or colorable imitations of the Spy Optic Marks. See Cook Decl. ¶¶ 11, 14-15.

B. Procedural Background

On December 8, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Complaint and on January 3, 2022, filed its Amended Complaint against Defendants. On December 9, 2021, Plaintiff filed its Ex Parte Motion for Order Authorizing Alternate Service of Process [ECF No. 7] (“Motion for Alternate Service”). The Court entered an Order Granting the Motion for Alternate Service on December 10, 2021 [ECF No. 10]. In accordance with the December 10, 2021, Order, Plaintiff served each Defendant with a Summons and a copy of the Amended Complaint via electronic mail and website posting on January 4, 2022. See Decl. of Virgilio Gigante (“Gigante Decl.”) [ECF No. 35-5] ¶ 7; Proof of Service [ECF No. 29].

Defendants failed to file an answer or other response, and the time allowed for Defendants to respond to the Amended Complaint has since expired. See Gigante Decl. ¶¶ 8-9. To Plaintiff's knowledge, Defendants are not infants or incompetent persons, and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act does not apply. See Id. ¶ 10. On March 10, 2022, the Clerk entered default against Defendants [ECF No. 31] for failure to plead or otherwise defend pursuant to Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff now moves the Court for default final judgment against Defendants.

LEGAL STANDARD

A party may apply to the court for a default judgment when the defendant fails to timely respond to a pleading. Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2). “A defendant, by his default, admits the plaintiff's well-pleaded allegations of fact, is concluded on those facts by the judgment, and is barred from contesting on appeal the facts thus established.” Eagle Hosp. Physicians, LLC v. SRG Consulting, Inc., 561 F.3d 1298, 1307 (11th Cir. 2009) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Nishimatsu Constr. Co. v. Houston Nat'l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1205 (5th Cir. 1975)). However, conclusions of law are to be determined by the court. Mierzwicki v. CAB Asset Mgmt. LLC, No. 14-61998, 2014 WL 12488533, at *1 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2014). Therefore, a court may enter a default judgment only if there is a “sufficient basis to state a claim.” Id.

Once a plaintiff has established a sufficient basis for liability, the Court must conduct an inquiry to determine the appropriate damages. PetMed Express, Inc. v. MedPets.Com, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d 1213, 1217 (S.D. Fla. 2004). Although an evidentiary hearing is generally required, the Court need not conduct such a hearing “when . . . additional evidence would be truly unnecessary to a fully informed determination of damages.” Safari Programs, Inc. v. CollectA Int'l Ltd., 686 Fed.Appx. 737, 746 (11th Cir. 2017). Therefore, where the record adequately supports the award of damages, an evidentiary hearing is not required. See SEC v. Smyth, 420 F.3d 1225, 1232 n.13 (11th Cir. 2005); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1217, 1223 (finding an evidentiary hearing unnecessary because plaintiff was seeking statutory damages under the Lanham Act); Luxottica Group S.p.A. v. Casa Los Martnez Corp., No. 14-22859, 2014 WL 4948632, at *2 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 2, 2014) (same).

ANALYSIS

A. Claims

Plaintiff seeks a default judgment for the relief sought in the Amended Complaint, asserting the following claims against Defendants: (1) trademark counterfeiting and infringement under section 32 of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1114 (“Claim 1”); (2) false designation of origin under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) (“Claim 2”); (3) cybersquatting under section 43(d) of the Lanham Act, in violation of 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d) (“Claim 3”); (4) unfair competition under Florida common law (“Claim 4”); and (5) trademark infringement under Florida common law (“Claim 5”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 46-80.

1.Counterfeiting and Infringement

Section 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. section 1114, provides liability for trademark infringement if, without the consent of the registrant, a defendant uses “in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark . . . which . . . is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive.” 15 U.S.C. § 1114(1)(a). To prevail on its trademark infringement claim, a plaintiff must demonstrate “(1) that it had prior rights to the mark at issue and (2) that the defendant had adopted a mark or name that was the same, or confusingly similar to its mark, such that consumers were likely to confuse the two.” Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188, 1193 (11th Cir. 2001) (footnote and citations omitted).

2. False Designation of Origin

The test for liability for false designation of origin under 15 U.S.C. section 1125(a) is the same as for a trademark counterfeiting and infringement claim-i.e., whether the public is likely to be deceived or confused by the similarity of the marks at issue. See Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc., 505 U.S. 763, 780 (1992) (Stevens, J., concurring in the judgment).

3. Cybersquatting

The Anti-cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act (“ACPA”) protects the owner of a distinctive or famous trademark from another's bad faith intent to profit from the trademark owner's mark by registering or using a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to, or dilutive of, the trademark owner's mark without regard to the goods or services of the parties. See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d). “To prevail under the ACPA, a plaintiff must prove that (1) its mark is distinctive or famous and entitled to protection; (2) the defendant's domain name is identical or confusingly similar to the plaintiff's mark; and (3) the defendant registered or used the domain name with a bad faith intent to profit.” See Bavaro Palace, S.A. v. Vacation Tours, Inc., 203 Fed.Appx. 252, 256 (11th Cir. 2006) (citing Shields v. Zuccarini, 254 F.3d 476, 482 (3d Cir. 2001)).

4. Common Law Unfair Competition

Whether a defendant's use of a plaintiff's trademarks created a likelihood of confusion between the plaintiff's and the defendant's products is also the determining factor in the analysis of unfair competition under the common law of Florida. See Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Forrester, No. 83-8381, 1986 WL 15668, at *3-4 (S.D. Fla. Dec. 9, 1986) (“[I]t is clear that the Court need not find ‘actual confusion' . . . . The proper test is ‘likelihood of confusion . . . .”').

5. Common Law Trademark Infringement

The analysis of liability for Florida common law trademark infringement is the same as the analysis of liability for trademark infringement under section 32(a) of the Lanham Act. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1217-18.

B. Liability

The well-pleaded factual allegations of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint properly contain the elements for each of the above claims and are admitted by virtue of Defendants' defaults. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 8-14, 24-38, 48-50, 54-58, 62-67, 72-73, and 78-79. Moreover, the Amended Complaint's factual allegations have been substantiated by sworn declarations and other evidence and establish Defendants' liability for each of the claims asserted. Accordingly, default judgment pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriately entered against Defendants.

C. Relief

Plaintiff requests an award of equitable relief and monetary damages against Defendants for trademark infringement in Claim 1 and cybersquatting in Claim 3. The Court analyzes Plaintiff's request for relief as to Claim 1 and Claim 3 only, as the judgment for Claims 2, 4, and 5-false designation of origin, common law unfair competition, and common law trademark infringement-is limited to entry of the requested equitable relief for Claim 1. See generally Mot. [ECF No. 35].

Injunctive Relief.

Pursuant to the Lanham Act, a district court is authorized to issue an injunction “according to the principles of equity and upon such terms as the court may deem reasonable, ” to prevent violations of trademark law. 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a). Indeed, “[i]njunctive relief is the remedy of choice for trademark and unfair competition cases, since there is no adequate remedy at law for the injury caused by a defendant's continuing infringement.” Burger King Corp. v. Agad, 911 F.Supp. 1499, 1509-10 (S.D. Fla. 1995) (alteration in original) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Century 21 Real Estate Corp. v. Sandlin, 846 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir. 1988)). Injunctive relief is available even in the default judgment setting, see, e.g., PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1222-23, because Defendants' failure to respond or otherwise appear makes it difficult for a plaintiff to prevent further infringement absent an injunction. See Jackson v. Sturkie, 255 F.Supp.2d 1096, 1103 (N.D. Cal. 2003) (“[D]efendant's lack of participation in this litigation has given the court no assurance that defendant's infringing activity will cease. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled to permanent injunctive relief.”).

Permanent injunctive relief is appropriate where a plaintiff demonstrates: (1) it has suffered irreparable injury; (2) there is no adequate remedy at law; (3) the balance of hardship favors an equitable remedy; and (4) an issuance of an injunction is in the public's interest. See eBay, Inc. v. MercExchange, LLC., 547 U.S. 388, 391-92 (2006). Plaintiff has carried its burden on each of the four factors.

Specifically, in trademark cases, “a sufficiently strong showing of likelihood of confusion [caused by trademark infringement] may by itself constitute a showing of . . . a substantial threat of irreparable harm.” E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross Int'l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1530 (11th Cir. 1985) (footnote omitted); see also Levi Strauss & Co. v. Sunrise Int'l Trading Inc., 51 F.3d 982, 986 (11th Cir. 1995) (“There is no doubt that the continued sale of thousands of pairs of counterfeit jeans would damage [the plaintiff's] business reputation and decrease its legitimate sales.”). Plaintiff's Amended Complaint and the submissions show that the goods produced and sold by Defendants are nearly identical to Plaintiff's genuine products, and consumers viewing Defendants' counterfeit goods post-sale would actually confuse them for Plaintiff's genuine products. See, e.g., Am. Compl. ¶ 85 (“Defendants' actions are likely to cause confusion of consumers at the time of initial interest, sale, and in the post-sale setting, who will believe all of Defendants' goods are genuine goods originating from, associated with, and/or approved by Plaintiff.”).

Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law so long as Defendants continue to operate the Subject Domain Names and Seller IDs because Plaintiff cannot control the quality of what appear to be its products in the marketplace. An award of monetary damages alone will not cure the injury to Plaintiff's reputation and goodwill if Defendants' infringing and counterfeiting continue. Moreover, Plaintiff faces hardship from loss of sales and its inability to control its reputation in the marketplace. By contrast, Defendants face no hardship if they are prohibited from the infringement of Plaintiff's trademarks. Finally, the public interest supports the issuance of a permanent injunction against Defendants to prevent consumers from being misled by Defendants' products, and potentially harmed by their inferior quality. See Chanel, Inc. v. besumart.com, 240 F.Supp.3d 1238, 1291 (S.D. Fla. 2016) (“[A]n injunction to enjoin infringing behavior serves the public interest in protecting consumers from such behavior.”) (citation omitted); World Wrestling Entm't, Inc. v. Thomas, No. 12-21018, 2012 WL 12874190, at *8 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 11, 2012) (considering the potential for harm based on exposure to potentially hazardous counterfeit merchandise in analyzing public's interest in an injunction).

Broad equity powers allow the Court to fashion injunctive relief necessary to stop Defendants' infringing activities. See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 15 (1971) (“Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court's equitable powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for . . . [t]he essence of equity jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do equity and to mould [sic] each decree to the necessities of the particular case.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 321 U.S. 707, 724 (1944) (“Equity has power to eradicate the evils of a condemned scheme by prohibition of the use of admittedly valid parts of an invalid whole.” (citations omitted)). District courts are expressly authorized to order the transfer or surrender of domain names in an in rem action against a domain name. See 15 U.S.C. §§ 1125(d)(1)(C), (d)(2). However, courts have not limited the remedy to that context. See, e.g., Philip Morris USA, Inc. v. Otamedia Ltd., 331 F.Supp.2d 228, 230 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. 2004) (transferring Yesmoke.com domain name to plaintiff despite the fact the plaintiff did not own a trademark in the term “Yesmoke” and noting 15 U.S.C. section 1125 “neither states nor implies that an in rem action against the domain name constitutes the exclusive remedy for a plaintiff aggrieved by trademark violations in cyberspace”); Ford Motor Co. v. Cross, 441 F.Supp.2d 837, 853 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (ordering the defendants to disclose all other domain registrations held by them and to transfer registration of a particular domain name to plaintiff in part under authority of 15 U.S.C. section 1116(a)).

Defendants have created an Internet-based counterfeiting scheme in which they are profiting from their deliberate misappropriation of Plaintiff's rights. Accordingly, the Court may fashion injunctive relief to eliminate the means by which Defendants are conducting their unlawful activities. Appropriate remedies to achieve this end include ordering the cancellation or transfer of the Subject Domain Names to Plaintiff; removing the Seller IDs' listings and images of goods; and requiring that the goods of each Defendant be surrendered to Plaintiff, such that these means may no longer be used as instrumentalities to further the sale of counterfeit goods.

Statutory Damages.

In a case involving the use of counterfeit marks in connection with the sale, offering for sale, or distribution of goods, 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) provides that a plaintiff may elect an award of statutory damages at any time before final judgment is rendered in the sum of not less than $1,000.00 nor more than $200,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(1). In addition, if the Court finds Defendants' counterfeiting actions were willful, it may impose damages above the maximum limit up to $2,000,000.00 per counterfeit mark per type of good. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(c)(2).

The Court has wide discretion to determine the amount of statutory damages. See PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1219 (citations omitted). An award of statutory damages is appropriate despite a plaintiff's inability to prove actual damages caused by a defendant's infringement. See Ford Motor Co., 441 F.Supp.2d at 852 (citations omitted) (“[A] successful plaintiff in a trademark infringement case is entitled to recover enhanced statutory damages even where its actual damages are nominal or non-existent.”); Playboy Enters., Inc. v. Universal Tel-A-Talk, Inc., No. 96-6961, 1998 WL 767440, at *8 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 3, 1998) (awarding statutory damages where plaintiff failed to prove actual damages or profits). The option of a statutory damages remedy in trademark counterfeiting cases is sensible given evidence of a defendant's profits in such cases is frequently almost impossible to ascertain. See, e.g., S. Rep. No. 104-177, pt. V § 7, at 10 (1995) (discussing purposes of Lanham Act statutory damages); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1220 (statutory damages are “[e]specially appropriate in default judgment cases due to infringer nondisclosure”) (citations omitted). This case is no exception.

Here, the allegations of the Amended Complaint and the evidence establish the Defendants intentionally copied one or more of the Spy Optic Marks for the purpose of deriving the benefit of Plaintiff's world-famous reputation. Defendants have defaulted on Plaintiff's allegations of willfulness. See Am. Compl. ¶ 31; Arista Records, Inc. v. Beker Enters., Inc., 298 F.Supp.2d 1310, 1313 (S.D. Fla. 2003) (finding a court may infer willfulness from the defendants' default); PetMed Express, Inc., 336 F.Supp.2d at 1217 (stating that upon default, well-pleaded allegations are taken as true). As such, the Lanham Act permits the Court to award up to $2,000,000.00 per infringing mark on each type of good as statutory damages to ensure Defendants do not continue their intentional and willful counterfeiting activities.

The only available evidence demonstrates that each Defendant promoted, distributed, advertised, offered for sale, and/or sold at least one (1) type of good bearing at least one (1) mark which is a counterfeit of one of the Spy Optic Marks protected by federal trademark registrations. See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 15, 24-32, 47-51; Cook Decl. 11-15. Based on the above considerations, Plaintiff has asked the Court to award statutory damages in the amount of $1,000,000.00 against each Defendant. See Mot. [ECF No. 35] at 15-16. The award should be sufficient to deter Defendants and others from continuing to counterfeit or otherwise infringe Plaintiff's trademarks, compensate Plaintiff, and punish Defendants, all stated goals of 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c). The Court finds that this award of statutory damages falls within the permissible range under 15 U.S.C. section 1117(c) and is just. See Fendi S.R.L. v. Joe Bag, No. 19-61356, 2019 WL 4693677 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 28, 2019) [ECF No. 43] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Adidas AG v. Global Online Shopping, No. 19-61180 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Louis Vuitton Malletier v. lv2014.skrar, No. 19-61015 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 40] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co. v. Artemis Gesdy, No. 19-60287 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 36] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Fendi S.R.L. v. socjmkfn, No. 19-61356 (S.D. Fla. 2019) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Goyard St Honore v. Agote, No. 17-62276, 2018 WL 2006870 (S.D. Fla. Apr. 19, 2018) [ECF No. 49] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant); Specialized Bicycle Components, Inc. v. 17 No.1-Own , No. 17-61201, 2017 WL 3016929 (S.D. Fla. July 14, 2017) [ECF No. 44] (awarding plaintiff $1,000,000.00 against each defendant).

Plaintiff's Amended Complaint also sets forth a cause of action for cybersquatting pursuant to the ACPA, 15 U.S.C. section 1125(d). As admitted by default, and established by the evidence submitted, Defendant Numbers 1-8 have acted with the bad-faith intent to profit from at least one of the Spy Optic Marks and the goodwill associated with the Spy Optic Marks by registering their respective Subject Domain Names which are identical, confusingly similar to, or dilutive of at least one of the Spy Optic Marks (“Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names”). See Am. Compl. ¶¶ 33-38, 62-68; Mot. at 29 (“Schedule B”). The Cybersquatted Subject Domain Name incorporates at least one of Plaintiff's trademarks in its entirety surrounded by a descriptive or generic term, rendering the domain name nearly identical to at least one of Plaintiff's trademarks.

Upon a finding of liability, the ACPA expressly empowers the Court to “order the forfeiture or cancellation of the domain name or the transfer of the domain name to the owner of the mark.” See 15 U.S.C. § 1125(d)(1)(c); Victoria's Cyber Secret Ltd. P'ship v. Secret Catalogue, Inc., 161 F.Supp.2d 1339, 1356 (S.D. Fla. 2001). Accordingly, Plaintiff is entitled to the transfer and ownership of Defendant Numbers 1-8's Cybersquatted Subject Domain Names because it is confusingly similar to at least one of Plaintiff's trademarks.

Additionally, Plaintiff may elect at any time before final judgment to recover actual damages or statutory damages of not less than $1,000.00 and not more than $100,000.00 per domain name, as the Court considers just. See 15 U.S.C. § 1117(d). Plaintiff has elected statutory damages and requests in view of Defendant Numbers 1-8's intentional, wrongful behavior, an award in the amount of $10,000.00 for its infringing domain name. See Mot. 18-19; Taverna Opa Trademark Corp. v. Ismail, No. 08-20776, 2010 WL 1838384, at *3 (S.D. Fla. May 6, 2010) (awarding $10,000.00 in statutory damages for domain name at issue). The Court finds this amount is just.

CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff is entitled to the entry of final default judgment. Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs Motion [ECF No. 35] is GRANTED. Default final judgment and a permanent injunction shall be entered by separate order.

DONE AND ORDERED in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, this 22nd day of March, 2022.

SCHEDULE “A”

DEFENDANTS BY NUMBER, SUBJECT DOMAIN NAME, SELLER ID, FINANCIAL ACCOUNT INFORMATION, MERCHANT ID, INFRINGING PRODUCT NUMBER, AND E-MAIL

Defendant Number

Defendant / Subject Domain Name / Seller ID

Financial Account Information: PayPal Account / Payee / Store Number

PayPal Merchant ID

Infringing Product Number / Additional Email

1

spy-outlets.com

QihuaLms87@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

langmanjgmiyo@gmail.com

xinyuandalj@outlook.com

2YNQGN249F42A

1

acvpe.shop

LongQsss15@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

1

mcdcown.shop

KeLilusong@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

1

ralpher.site

reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

Yun-z Network Technology Co., Ltd

KHRDTU7G5V3RN

1

sp.rvpd.shop

LJiansf14@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

reeghandbsjgb@gmail.com

1

spopsunglass.shop

WguangXzx64@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

1

spyoptiglasses.shop

Yun-z Network Technology Co., Ltd

KHRDTU7G5V3RN

1

spy-optiglasses.shop

Yun-z Network Technology Co., Ltd

KHRDTU7G5V3RN

1

spysunglasses.shop

DuaneRigginsdlc@gmail.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

xionganyunze@outlook.com

1

spy-sunglasses.shop

Weixyzzm80@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com

1

xtydd.shop

cskwdzfdh649@outlook.com

service@noreply.spfactoryou t.com service@dealsvipuw.shop

Sharp Liss Mall

Yun-z Network Technology Co., Ltd

KHRDTU7G5V3RN

2

spymensandwomenssun glasses.online

Populargoods2021@outlook.com

VPBBB3L87UKNW

service@noreply.vipclientwe b.com

2

spyglasses.online

Fuyang Chuangmi Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

VPBBB3L87UKNW

2

spymensandwomenssun glasses.shop

Fuyang Chuangmi Electronic Commerce Co., Ltd.

VPBBB3L87UKNW

3

spysunglasss.shop

Soyadgming@outlook.com

service@noreply.spvipcs.co m

3

spsunglassi.shop

mzguangxun@hotmail.com

service@noreply.spvipcs.co m

3

spyglasses.shop

SO YA Home Building materials Co., Ltd

5YXTF5MP942QW

3

spyopglasss.shop

bjylqdsmlx217@outlook.com

LV8XE2QQX4TXL

service@noreply.spvipcs.co m

4

spyplusglasses.shop

SufondiBusiness@outlook.com

XB82FABLB5AEY

service@service.glassddmail. com

4

spyplussunglasses.shop

yichuanghua2265@outlook.com

service@service.glassddmail. com

Dejapopulor@outlook.com

4

spyprosunglasses.shop

yuanxinhong520@outlook.com

service@service.glassddmail. com

5

spysunglasses.store

lutherdesigninc@outlook.com

service@noreply.bestretailsal e.com

vttantiusly@outlook.com

PAV5EAJ668PGG

choiceGroupt@outlook.com

2Q5Y7XD5RT6VL

5

spsunglassale.shop

highwaylifestyle@outlook.com

service@noreply.bestretailsal e.com

cloudwelldeal@outlook.com

Three Kingdoms Business Service (Chongqing) Co., Ltd.

PAV5EAJ668PGG

6

spysunglassi.shop

LeiMoneys34@outlook.com

7

spyglassesdztr.shop

wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

7

spdai.shop

Terence Online Centre

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

7

spdfh.shop

Terence Online Centre

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

7

spyglasses21.shop

FoshanBeldenshop@outlook.com

U74DXH4TB3BLJ

Terence Online Centre

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

binlidatrading@outlook.com

GTUQNMS8UYPC Y

yishanclothingshop@outlook.com

3SYSBMF65RZEQ

mantinggeclothing@outlook.com

9TQ2EPSSVU7VS

7

spyglasseswear.shop

wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

support@noreply.usglassessh op.com

7

spzth.shop

wangguanfang4100@hotmail.com

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

Chandler Outlet Shop EAPM79JPAs@outlook.com

Y9J89XE52FHPL

7

spzzf.shop

Terence Online Centre

YULBEJTZ8LUE8

support@noreply.usglassessh op.com

7

spysunglassesbsnc.shop

ZinaOwens2500@hotmail.com

8N6B3LJPJPPUC

support@noreply.usglassessh op.com

Farrell Fashion Market zhaolin5063wv@hotmail.com

LAVDYHARMNG8 W

lingfantradeshop@outlook.com

S69RUAJQ682KE

ruimiaoclothingstore ruimiaoclothingstore@outlook.co m

AYTYK3T24S7U6

7

fwysunglasses.xyz

xushuang1996815@outlook.com

support@noreply.usglassessh op.com

YuanZhenhua9720@outlook.com

7

noaglassesoutlet.online

GaoJincheng0201@outlook.com

support@noreply.usglassessh op.com

duanfei5847@hotmail.com

T6PRHFMJA7DP6

bethanypeterson38@hotmail.com

E6CDQ9K6WZH72

zhanglisha226@outlook.com

SDC33XZJPEMP8

zhouli9636@outlook.com

VKXRZCTCMSS6 G

johnrussell5398@hotmail.com

W4BB4YRB8GD24

8

spysunglassesopid.shop

XiaoyuCommerceStore@outlook. com

48YBJPZBSP8V6

JaydaColeman880@hotmail.com

CVZU66HDD4844

Hangzhou Miyou Trading Company xuhongliang1977@outlook.com

L5H9R97ELK7Q4

hancuimingfangshop@outlook.co m

84WUZA72BZ2LN

9

tgbdm.shop

crayfishsite@zoho.com.cn

sale@tgbdm.shop

10

xjhmyj.online

Fr0i6hxivn9ELWR@outlook.com

support@noreply.ixglassessh op.com

14

all in onestore

Transaction ID: 5CE88951U7101741V

353497455468

18

jackma21

Transaction ID: 70P48822WR178905H

284325842071

21

locas 6443

Transaction ID: 6N973421KF253070U

393407815919

23

88bar

yitanghuameng22@163.com

194260700085

24

chonganstore

chathumilakshan@gmail.com

393314084511

25

fanshop88

fanzhifandz@outlook.com

384062558634

Transaction ID: 001121515L837603J

384062558634

26

global-shop-online a/k/a subastas-outlet-2000

canosacasa@gmail.com

174270267341

Transaction ID: 48G31184JS6765017

174270267341

27

globix.store

narek719957@gmail.com

363324987853

28

hahaeveryday

gao19851224ka@hotmail.com

324669771750

29

happyniu2019

happyniuniu2019@aliyun.com

253757925740

Transaction ID: 8EH691478 Y3982244

253757925740

30

happysolutions

happysolutions.zj@gmail.com

373554128163

31

maryord-14

timght@gmail.com

402754603639

32

tha baby

thababy987@gmail.com

133797341544

33

the full cart.store

icontrolss99@gmail.com

265081772037

34

ukstorelk

priyantha.kumara19890317@gma il.com

265093620855

35

universalestore99

razvanszalacsi@yahoo.com

384048024996

36

v*lianxstore*v

guodonggeng1988@163.com

284250780141

37

Cycling Travel Store

900243034

1005001388699641

38

Dian&Yang Store

5434117

1005001345949234 4000649124725

39

GOOOG Store

911239106

1005002091965733 1005001872859645

40

OANRAYS Store

4052093

32969943538

41

Phineed Sunglasses Drop Shipping Store

4495053

1005002301760882 1005002301795675

42

Shop5023094 Store

5023094

1005001464791457

43

Sunglasses Franchised Store

1452061

10050023006699411005002539362463 1005002539326773

44

URUS Store

3133026

1005002320327092 1005001471344671

45

Awesome Glasses Store

5798675

1005002549002212

46

chengcheng Sunglasses Store

4033087

32891145534 32873124816 32884525314

47

GOOD SUNGLASSES Store

911908147

1005002547762105

48

MG-SUNGLASSES Store

911757441

10050023483938711005002719478226

49

RoadBlock Store

911032014

10050016922808211005001708266561

50

Shop5081471 Store

5081471

1005002136925298 1005002137018039

51

Shop900251481 Store

900251481

1005001557924283 1005002092047673

52

Shop911515004 Store

911515004

1005002109821602 1005003088913605 10050028196328311005002488104343 1005002487928865 1005002487953798

53

Sunbright Sunglasses Drop Shopper Store

911790020

1005002390845265

54

WF Store

4445007

32926023003

55

WGESUN Store

911773151

1005002932195393

56

Ywjanp Store

4639086

32959547173

57

ZAIQING Store

5427086

4000325606340

58

ZSMEYE Official Store

4215017

1005001616975103

59

danuelhouses

21635550

664599247

60

dhgate bagss

21661176

688783944

61

dhgate glasses

21661179

688782742

62

dhgateclothing

21661172

688941880

63

guomimenlu

15749601

449066521

64

happydhgatestores

21609010

629298204

65

hermane

20329350

671141868

66

kingclothings

21661145

688786877

67

kingfashionmall

21661189

688785777

68

kingqueenhair

21661187

688784272

69

kingsunglasses

21661174

688782804

70

ladyqueens

21661185

688820767

71

mingsdhgateso

21641914

673141382

72

qy8sunglasses

21639619

662100612

73

skywatchs

21661133

688782499

74

superbagss

21661184

688994631

75

troydaniels

21635198

671814594

76

hopesunglasses

20732060

402274523

77

ppfashionshop

20765093

412716568

78

Ailefent Lemeng Taiger 5ec26d4aa6438b57a5042fbe

605806b53a6f62b168a0d254 605c3106dcda4feba2d1bd13 60668f80f2a102b79d31f7e4 606565719f5f961d4f5fb613

79

Banbudadada

5b3091657752c8045c725e64

6076b1868cec4da62d734fcb

80

Best of Tumblr

601fa7f6044fbb2d0c901c97

607e8d0f880029352d9033df

81

briqoghve

5e5b4954f5995fcdddce110d

60586083735a5f953c4af1ea

82

chcan23

5ebf375bbf13a520032b35a6

606b32b62c207bdd160e4e93 607c3fd52d2ceee395db22a0 606dcecb0e715f594ef10f56 60abf8ac423bda26dbd10344

84

Fashion taste of life

586fbd8b8c30e82bdcce557d

5f43839ff371645631d37bf9

85

fghyhcfue

5fa0d10433a6743e629e86db

60628b628a5caf64de3931e4

86

gaoshan Store

5f58944614f157568adff656

606c6cf901f55a576636d422

87

Happy shopping GOGOGOGO

586e3c438c30e8093e5c6bc3

5f4383a96cd8f977eb6782af

88

hnxiaodong1027

603f54b4c45b713b857d534d

6052e42bd3e0b009f7083308

89

jntajtjmtj

5b0243a37d4d84171b90b7fe

6051bb522b1c9d3b3840e609

90

Just For You Baby

5837fc7e0299bc07d974a4da

60795b08c89f6d79bc265664

91

likuibaihuopu

5e5e17df6a6aff18ea64f93b

605d5159711b379ef828d244

92

meiqingmuxiu

5d7f4382b6b4c23c83cceb46

606d5e472329ed5608fd6704

93

mengmenga

5d831e6422e7777c42dc187e

604864b3bdcaa4ba10641c41

94

Neuroscience Online

601fac7b4eeb7304eab94012

6064188d3f9f2b5b41a17d3d 6051a6971b25d3f4f5a2ba3b

95

nixiao

5941185a20d56c1aaf9ccd6d

606c4c9b76908ce4a4530181

96

QHU78SHI

5d5b867e283abc43e94a3320

60826ba1ca26625c5a067cd3

97

qinmingjingpinpu

5e5f910ca6757d1882435a7c

6059acc2000beb93a5d0f99f

98

sadweqd22

5d5b44a634037d39c521bca3

6073e37e9391ad3779706b74

99

shiqiaofengya

5d7f50a48c8dc70a40b96bf4

60655ca591bc9d06d7fff27c

100

SHUTEBO4

5aaf8ab8b9605f1f0501e064

606edf0216bd9eeef7c9477f 606558a016d8a100d1f4f747 6073d9a9a6b2fb23cb0e837d

101

Shuwak Bairand Qilasrert

5ec8f713f3f35248964b9e36

60580f25406b07a1f58892b2

102

smeathebphd

5e96ad30ecbf9d3a78765f37

5f6ac45c6b2e4b0a49e0d2a0

103

sooplight

57d12217c496d10fd6a706fd

6064174781ef15589b5ee7de

104

tuesdrtg

5e37a660a548d5447592acbd

6056f3df094529d668b7168a

105

uzice

5fcf5bbbf7b2025cb191b7df

606aa8791c34b45835e881d4

106

wangzhikun666

5e5098947b7ddf054069a67e

5ff9751b4f35c096b78aa941

107

Warmspringsun

5af6901c7824ca1f63417eef

606eae330b72966cec7a5872

108

Week bar

576f43c1007370740c4bed34

5f4383b6045f830039e4c868

109

WLH store

587a23db0366d00cb28dd4f1

5f37de71b4faef0051293e04

111

zfyyouth0101

5a38a7d512fa1c56af8f093a

607948fb08e3be45290b9bde

112

zhaohaofeng

584833b3582efa13144a8364

60ae657419e6fdfe1d215358

113

apilooking

58a56b643a8c36510ee68041

6085131ced0358ee18154813

114

neutrally fly

59205c7e81f8e7245bf5140e

60cc6e4d0f8ea26a65f71f56

115

MISSGU

59771e8fc7f5051ea2f6674e

6065427005ea2db96c78c519 60f0fd7fd3c058554fb83dc7 6094b32ca5410564d08a03a7

116

czyouth2029

59e99bab5d6f343c89a617e6

60bad77d8f1da43a81e1f1f9

117

tatalo115

5abc92364215952aaf9e949b

608688312c450d6b0e62935e

118

luoxiansheng

5abfcdaea6f62e41d1698be6

608a1bcee76a660e831249e1

119

bingbadaoao

5b02226b66ca1b177872dcb0

60667a43afcf635ea99a0036

122

Zhaozhao2

5b2cb14c5676c3789521c70d

6093541df484137aa5ce156c

123

NB yi

5b4da960d5dbc2205d4422e0

606563578f61401a85d399ef

124

duo-guo

5b90b3d08d567673376780ac

60af2bdcc8611502546de40d

125

Game & Toys

5d3f1660e4b65d62081e7379

609a43fc4878deed03450421

126

krhs

5d42c9ab8388970cf92a26c4

606c283bf4ee697c73b7dcc9

127

44j6trw

5d43e8124c78556cc1e59ba1

60655e1e4dd35e0628d0ddd9

128

89gagky

5d43f95170327a6cea6831d7

606d15242133e28db22f4ae6

129

nkjdvv

5d491d667ad2420a41ba4b13

609b8e0de60c465636037cac

130

Yoogamer

5d50d8507ad242504df71fbd

60cc23a41da1f1ca823a7ae6

131

ZZML

5d626d3127367804f6ad691f

6114c2ab1c541f519cd74951

132

aijia-liuxin

5d7dc08a8c8dc75f83888523

60dfdfc151488ac5aa996a66

133

wenchenggongzhu

5d7f4d2a2888354bc2398112

60654237fc05b4bb845d9541

134

enjoy oneself nice

5d821eb71c4dc67a24f4983d

60826b84df16f1400d4b874a

135

1212ZX

5d82d3dc7e8eba597d35cdae

606680db3b7c5386534dadba

136

KOUYB761

5d88241a8c8dc7531846c080

606c01119c5b33125161530a

137

QIYYY12

5d8c5fed7137803c00f0cd88

606556513fa761f05cd99ec3

138

vidmhjf

5e211bed54e85f0645e903ef

60cabd743ae6ceb7267ca0cf

139

iandgero

5e3693d5e489d51c6c965ccd

607a78ea68dc6e2242f89dcf

140

xinyuxiaodian

5e590c271c24e498554bb3ca

60cabca6a444b9ab2c2c409d

141

baueklus

5e5b50936ac64ed6bef9d7b0

6059ac9aa924ffa78997d4e8

142

qinmingzahuopu

5e5f81bcec5cd32a4141320e

60713d8dd3d4c732bddc8c17

143

qinmingjingpin

5e5f8a2ac422b90ddf57dc0b

606ea34b5996913f9bef211b

144

guanshengzahuo

5e5f9f7ea6757d426b430299

609cbbf6c295327826236e64

145

grieiydebso

5e6089e2cdcecef095820158

60b8b38045bdf62c28ba09e6

146

zhangqingbaihuo

5e60eb50cce71246311386d7

60655d35c633db023a4f0fc9 61249a61f9af80226d64591d 606c3de698a6ffc498d74012 60cc3c81cc44fb02093fc83f

147

dongpingxiaodian

5e61c752c6cc3a12cd89d456

605ef017b9efaf464af56a66

148

rannujoqge

5e670ba2589024313913f491

606fedcb03c36b31b85d80ca 607ec6e47839f8b763074697

149

Autumn Vogelx

5e685212f2699a321ec3cd28

5f655c24491d290040e36ef0

150

wfh09

5e6932d72fb13fe3c20a9328

607d3de9a357035eea00e68c

151

YunraojidL

5e6ce5171e1985070025312b

6094ef60111b0200ed21286c

152

YHJWAN

5e71dafedada4f0047d046e0

60fbb7304e7c0a4e100a0b12

153

Antonioza

5e7472d64e1e8233d02c17c7

6121c606a160fbccc4d44813

154

znufcu

5e78cb3b4fed550ec06652f8

60cc2503ae0654db16f36f29

155

guss6g4q0oc4

5e80b477e273cd57004b2f81

60ee8ec5b61b6968c6d04b40

156

mclasetfvvo

5e904d4e9bbc2b09428f055f

608506bfdaf5b3ff07164a70

157

daffitbljfau

5e93647f46be6ad700df1e05

60201c591138a6ca7141f8e5

158

teeteightvju

5e93779ca93effe22247901c

608ebc174304ef7e0d0bdeae

159

thotethoby

5e937c14a93effe4cf4790b0

60c4e4721a1b83b1c02ec32e

160

titateskixles

5e958aee0bd69706e2155a5d

5f655c005c090f2ac6e8cb19

161

losekkgy

5e958c4365a1793001fc9822

5f655c059c952d30e879f880

162

slithesbnoosj

5e958e8edc7da93bdb768103

5f655bfa6e695630c625c979

163

sheshiriemc

5e958efadc7da93bb47681f1

5f655bfbd868940040745a64

164

nesheighoyroe

5e958f7f3b55ac02001a4abd

5f655bfc329c60004f0e33a8

165

patitoughmexaa

5e958ff94ebef1398df4ec82

5f655bfdd6d5b82ebf282987

166

mcshoorefkhiqp

5e9590e6fbe93c37856fcb83

5f655bfe6b556513890a4b20

167

toatasuqpff

5e959a26ec27b440dbcb9bfc

5f6ac49696703b003eda2d95

168

shockoufs

5e96c11e058b714c78edc5e6

5f655c26377fb73330945be7

169

Marilynyya

5e987135920fc8bad4f28db0

5f655c088ab312311a7f7025

170

CharlesUUa

5e992ab629e7861e74d267ef

5f655bf943b3a13285201104

171

Terraaa

5e9967bbeece7658c06696fb

5f655c208ab31234237f628e

172

angelaaaa

5e9968e95ca37f2315577c7b

5f655c0a03764d003dbfaa04

173

Lisaaaa

5e996d6229e7866629d2668a

5f655c0c7348d12d8ad245d1

174

Luisaa

5e9970eaeece7632026724c2

5f655c22d696590045b0e126

175

TracyAnneaa

5e997707f4479b8161df335a

5f655c0e2745750df87cebf3

176

Amyaa

5e9977d2eda468830dbeb3f2

5f655c0798368f34ddb34d41

177

Brianaa

5e9979e85ca37f31ce577c1f

5f655c06cd8a68378dfc5149

178

Williamaaee

5ea2501173900e124a7c8a56

602012bd1473460050b5de2 d

179

Markaaee

5ea255eec8d26d16c0e98755

5f70b469eb378c2929694683

180

Oliviaaaee

5ea2563641e7f02f7aad7cdd

5f655bebc3bc7f318d9091eb

181

pataaee

5ea25926e34afe0440dfba96

5f655bee5616ce3131b19000

182

Senbeneng cots

5efebc2892285a6b467c5878

608b66d90e71d539c563c2d0

183

torowivens

5f06aa9ab730762c440effa6

608af6fe06c6761c756eb5eb

184

mjtyj

5f2e4481a1eaf802e8b78a55

60f7d578477be8bd4792ce7d

185

iposter6653

5f40969136d382840e1a4517

60c4834a25c5611d54189876

186

Shoperan

5f427ee829e78637230587fa

60c663b13c367a6e1d1f684d

187

MariaJeans

5f43227d29e7863e700587ac

608bb147e9c150ddaa86e108

188

HTHRT

5f4648a006543fd4db394ffc

60b476290a785b18f3cc6b73

189

Porron shop

5f51c81603c06e25012e1e9c

607a036bb64f2aac661b4bfd

190

Ronald david barrios

5f6b57683e645b3d7658ffcd

6081e44af36d5bf2886fda47

191

Variedades Yuli

5f6bd4374cc3885930be9f66

6086315571569021208bafde

192

Creaciones jbelen

5f6be07bd2741989f75fadc6

6080875d11c3497a0bcd89df

193

Oxirisplayolv

5f6e2b0aa498d577a735ed90

607d2ab7afb4dc058c8d0e3e

194

Catshop.vicky

5f73d18ade6a5337a8ce3c55

609097ef8e747b90139674c5

195

facilitoandre2

5f7425a009237cbea0ba738f

607911e754dd90af7503ee59

197

zhanggang68

5f7eaa9d498e2b10ea8fa7a1

606c5f014ef5751bec9c78cd

198

Market Truts Crosk

5f7fa03f1689b500505d28a3

607f7696988fd8005e95b242

199

hangyungjian

5f7ff538e64ad803fc562f9e

606c5dcc4859a50d60e2910a

200

hybridization

5f8db7ba19a61afb83f6c187

60c3fa43d18ef90632d8284d

201

laevulose

5f8dbe1fc525e5b69c1dab83

60dfd8697c6203ca979b1957

202

Dickens

5f8dd4661c80850d30f16476

611a44f4c6b3c700771d3244

203

QISHENE

5f8f5f56de940f07c2c7ff6e

6078115b545859cdedde69cb

204

ganocephala

5f8fc15843db78e4bcc9cf73

603dd94074d102a1472fd87d

205

Eviegive

5f9192a5446a0d8f7fd5f823

60a1e8f11370de24003cb533

206

Sigdsjcvhjc

5f9220d319c41e1a0c1bf23d

60a1e8811fada4a2f5aa042f

207

SxCN

5f9a3e3e59048313bdf857a2

6073af4c1e4351b434eeaca6

208

francia y paris

5f9b00ba2a917a027d8af5a4

6090adf8d16a618fd05a3da4

209

pedritoperes212

5f9b11370e46e935f1c80381

607e30c0519b5147ea16c9e1

210

lacasadeloshuevosdeoro

5f9b3a4359048374c9f85630

60853ce8ff1c29f0695ae6a8

211

prendamayoress

5f9b3caa8a161ae5c85ca898

606b7360852e0faa27fd9134

212

Novedades Irene S

5f9b49f8c934d70467f27640

60807944992aca259c6a89ee

213

Brocylon

5f9b59a1c934d7112cf2766e

607c5d4163e3dbddcefe99c1

214

Oswaldo food fast online

5f9c61a323aaec7e83a51b7b

605e67e421ad6db221fd331f

215

inversiones auto cauchos

5f9d87766535343487d4faa1

607dff536760324444e4ea5a

216

Desordenados

5f9f5d1116ae6905d12c21b5

608da6295a5e6d0b7fc23b6c

217

huangdan1980

5f9f8afc6535341cf9d4f940

60d591b35d9786008d0e88f8

218

lindos mares

5fc2ff9c10cec6db8f6735c5

608be7a4b5c8885e30366b8a

219

Qacmary

5fc601fabee3db6dac044a31

60f4dbe1c3c1845199b8ae8d

220

Serbeiro

5fcbc49491d2e50dd476120d

60ad8b3a30a15f005dd36571

221

County Seat

5fcc38adb3d3424f52d1c73a

607a69158bafeefc582109a8

222

Superior Interactive

5fcc66d88540d181e21e64b6

6077ce40d434ae05313d1535

223

Galaxy Man Man

5fcc67f2b3d34273aed1c7eb

607a694ef15349fedcd0d428

224

Veramons

5fcc6a4368d20e77eba1acd3

60797f9d096afeed47734d8b

225

Purity 88

5fcceeb6c68845038e77ccef

607a69341b9755f4a5dc12b7

226

Alibean

5fcd447991d2e542df76115e

60a9b6deb55e040ec7c02e6d

227

burguerazul

5fce93f991d2e587f676117c

60c083f5dac04a4e521c539a

228

nativeeast

5fce985f1b3ca391133a2a3a

60b7b74ed4405e1a2aa70439

229

bosscosmetics

5fce9e7ab1d5b403205f45cf

60bea024144bf930a7bb9232

230

Ghombro

5fd1e5f149eb683a3d8a794e

60b42786daa7bdbd5055d734

231

Pasardo Store

5fd26b828145f8200fa527b3

60b57724d81faf6dcce0685c

232

Tobys St-tore

5fd28366e2ffdf350da7c044

60b4b62109a1a9ee98352152

233

Store My Tinos

5fd28a6280265a004af9709f

60aed9506c645945b5b3ffac

234

Anime MyS

5fd29fdc53011c10b704b692

60b56a3d40d411290a570585

235

Elizabetbus

5fd3ad5dc64c70acd276ab30

60bf07a0b5e81dd844a9c213

236

Impulsively

5fd3c06f58cd77c3d6e7f65c

60dd08f4d5cc565f3bb09726

237

Charlesparkle

5fd5226a7885461cb1393636

60ce20fb12d62d54f333c42b

238

Heavenly4

5fd79922c4fa1b3faa6300ef

60bf06ce4cbb11c99c04b467

239

Cauthias

5fd7cca74706208bd3206bc3

60d2c86fe4f5ed566b4da291

240

Jaycjohnso

5fd8161c8076461c3fbfcdf4

60c23f7beca8eaeda7117f8f

241

Lovvly

5fda974856a431861eef123e

60cd104be6ea27ca2d098c42

242

dtryeuy

5fe2e5eaf35ecb61eff524ae

60a3703db4922f88b09d52d2

243

Creative and novel shop

600f6d62bc5d790f90f74a6b

6077c8913d7953f653688a87

244

WANGZ4599CFCF

6040771586290b0bc09c72dd

608167ce57dcb1da65378a24

245

zhaojihua2412

604d74659d156e5eaf1d7457

60865c126315badbd8b957a1

246

tianfengxia3628

6064066a7603f804dca5f32b

60faa730a5eb40863d390a1d

247

Sand Corruptions

6064ee0a28856b004262c9f2

60ba1a4dcf3883674b945f59

248

wangyujun896

60682a6ae08c778173ae24be

60adabda07fc2d5a7dd6d08f

249

chongzhiauu

60727f5b0e3b2992bfd4403b

609366712de88751e2af3a7c

250

tkbx1122

6077d22ceaf4c85900af739d

60963017a54105e88c89feaf

251

Johsonxi

60927ab4854dbf530c7231ed

60cc3b40bf9c8bf2821b3765

252

wangxiaofei223368

609b5337e6e60f2306254001

60d2ae1a411d610046ae8530


Summaries of

SPY Optic Inc. v. The Individuals

United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Mar 22, 2022
No. 21-CV-62472-RAR (S.D. Fla. Mar. 22, 2022)
Case details for

SPY Optic Inc. v. The Individuals

Case Details

Full title:SPY OPTIC INC., Plaintiff, v. THE INDIVIDUALS, BUSINESS ENTITIES, AND…

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Florida

Date published: Mar 22, 2022

Citations

No. 21-CV-62472-RAR (S.D. Fla. Mar. 22, 2022)