From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spuller v. Cashcall, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2014
No. 5:13-CV-806-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 2014)

Summary

In Spuller v. Cashcall, No. 5:13–CV–806–D, 2014 WL 3923513 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 2014), the Eastern District of North Carolina did not find that North Carolina public policy invalidated the forum selection clause based on similar arguments, so this court will focus its analysis on the tribal court jurisdiction issue, which was not presented to the Eastern District.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Western Sky Financial, LLC

Opinion

No. 5:13-CV-806-D

03-05-2014

DANIEL SPULLER, Plaintiff, v. CASHCALL, INC., and DELBERT SERVICES CORPORATION, Defendants.


ORDER

On December 18, 2013, defendants Cashcall, Inc. and Delbert Services Corporation filed a joint motion to dismiss or in the alternative to stay and compel arbitration. See [D.E. 11]. On February 7, 2014, plaintiff Daniel Spuller responded in opposition. See [D.E. 14]. On February 24, 2014, defendants replied. See [D.E. 15].

Spuller has not plausibly alleged that either defendant obtained the forum selection clause by fraud or overreaching. See, e.g., Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. Shute, 499 U.S. 585, 595 (1991); Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co., 417 U.S. 506.519 (1974); Bryant Elec. Co. v. Citv of Fredericksburg, 762 F.2d 1192, 1197 (4th Cir. 1985); cf. Compl. [D.E. 1-3] ¶¶ 1-58; Fed. R. Civ. P. 9(b). Moreover, North Carolina public policy does not invalidate the forum selection clause. See, e.g., M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1,9-12 (1972); Albemarle Corp. v. AstraZeneca UK Ltd., 628 F.3d 643, 650 (4th Cir. 2010). Finally, Spuller has not plausibly alleged that the claims at issue are not suitable for arbitration. See, e.g., Rent-A-Ctr., W., Inc. v. Jackson, 130 S. Ct. 2772, 2777-79 (2010); Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna, 546 U.S. 440, 443-46 (2006); Green Tree Fin. Corp. - Alabama v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 91-92 (2000).

In light of the contract's forum selection clause, the court GRANTS the motion to dismiss [D.E. 14]. See, e.g., Atl. Marine Constr. Co. v. U.S. Dist. Court for W. Dist. of Texas, 134 S. Ct. 568, 583 n.8 (2013); Albemarle Corp., 628 F.3d at 650.

__________

JAMES C. DEVER III

Chief United States District Judge


Summaries of

Spuller v. Cashcall, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION
Mar 5, 2014
No. 5:13-CV-806-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 2014)

In Spuller v. Cashcall, No. 5:13–CV–806–D, 2014 WL 3923513 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 2014), the Eastern District of North Carolina did not find that North Carolina public policy invalidated the forum selection clause based on similar arguments, so this court will focus its analysis on the tribal court jurisdiction issue, which was not presented to the Eastern District.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Western Sky Financial, LLC

In Spuller, the court found that the plaintiff had not “plausibly alleged that either defendant obtained the forum selection clause by fraud or overreaching,” nor was the forum selection clause invalidated by North Carolina public policy.

Summary of this case from Brown v. Western Sky Financial, LLC
Case details for

Spuller v. Cashcall, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL SPULLER, Plaintiff, v. CASHCALL, INC., and DELBERT SERVICES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA WESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 5, 2014

Citations

No. 5:13-CV-806-D (E.D.N.C. Mar. 5, 2014)

Citing Cases

Brown v. Western Sky Financial, LLC

See, e.g., Inetianbor v. CashCall, Inc., 768 F.3d 1346 (11th Cir.2014), petition for cert. filed, 83 U.S.L.W.…