From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spuck v. Salynski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-344E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 22-344E

12-28-2022

DANIEL L. SPUCK, Plaintiff, v. MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE, Defendant.


Maureen P. Kelly, Magistrate Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge

This case has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(A) and (B), and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 72.

On December 2, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report (Doc. 7) recommending that this case be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Service of the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) was made on Plaintiff, and he has filed Objections. See Docs. 6 & 8.

After a de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections thereto, it hereby is ORDERED that this case is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The dismissal is without prejudice to Plaintiff's filing a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court, if and as appropriate. The R&R (Doc. 7) is adopted as the Opinion of the District Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spuck v. Salynski

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 28, 2022
Civil Action 22-344E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)
Case details for

Spuck v. Salynski

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. SPUCK, Plaintiff, v. MARY KATHRYN SALYNSKI, ESQUIRE, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 28, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 22-344E (W.D. Pa. Dec. 28, 2022)