From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spuck v. Ridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 10, 2013
Case No. 1:07-cv-310-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2013)

Opinion

Case No. 1:07-cv-310-SJM-SPB

06-10-2013

DANIEL L. SPUCK, Plaintiff, v. FORMER GOVERNOR THOMAS RIDGE, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Plaintiff's complaint in the instant civil rights action was received by the Clerk of Court on November 6, 2007 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter for report and recommendation in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrates. By Memorandum Order dated January 5, 2009 [37], this Court adopted the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation to dismiss Plaintiff's claims in their entirety, and the case was closed. Plaintiff subsequently took an appeal and the Court's January 5, 2009 Memorandum Order was affirmed by the Third Circuit Court of Appeals on October 6, 2009 [43].

Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to reopen the case [56]. That motion was denied via a Text Order entered by this Court on October 10, 2012.

Currently pending is Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and/or reargument [67] relative to my October 10, 2012 Text Order. However, after filing his motion for reconsideration and/or reargument, Plaintiff appealed my October 10, 2012 ruling to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. Pursuant to Rule 62.1 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, my options are limited to the following: (1) defer consideration of Plaintiff's pending motion; (2) deny the motion outright; or (3) state either that I would grant the motion if the court of appeals remands for that purpose or that the motion raises a substantial issue. Fed. R. Civ. P. 62.1(a). Accordingly, the following Order is entered:

AND NOW, to wit, this 10th Day of June, 2013, upon consideration of Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration and/or reargument [67],

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is DENIED.

_____________

SEAN J. MCLAUGHLIN

Chief United States District Judge
Cm: All counsel of record.

Daniel L. Spuck

CZ-4825

SRCF Mercer

801 Butler Pike

Mercer, PA 16137

U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan Paradise Baxter


Summaries of

Spuck v. Ridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jun 10, 2013
Case No. 1:07-cv-310-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2013)
Case details for

Spuck v. Ridge

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. SPUCK, Plaintiff, v. FORMER GOVERNOR THOMAS RIDGE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

Case No. 1:07-cv-310-SJM-SPB (W.D. Pa. Jun. 10, 2013)

Citing Cases

Spuck v. Nat'l Football League

In this case, Plaintiff is a "prisoner" within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff's three strikes…