From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spuck v. Fredric

U.S.
Nov 28, 2011
132 S. Ct. 781 (2011)

Opinion

No. 11–6806.

11-28-2011

Daniel L. SPUCK, petitioner, v. Ammerman FREDRIC.


Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and petition submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia

Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1, 113 S.Ct. 397, 121 L.Ed.2d 305 (1992) (per curiam ).


Summaries of

Spuck v. Fredric

U.S.
Nov 28, 2011
132 S. Ct. 781 (2011)
Case details for

Spuck v. Fredric

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. SPUCK v. AMMERMAN FREDRIC

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 28, 2011

Citations

132 S. Ct. 781 (2011)
181 L. Ed. 2d 476
80 U.S.L.W. 3319