From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spruill v. Lute

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Feb 15, 2013
1:13-CV-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2013)

Opinion

1:13-CV-1

02-15-2013

WILLIAM SPRUILL, Plaintiff, v. CO LUTE, ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER and JUDGMENT

The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on January 23, 2013, was served on the parties in this action. No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by § 636.

The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

It is therefore ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is filed, but dismissed sua sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new complaint which corrects the defects cited in the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation.

This the 15th day of February, 2013.

_______________

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Spruill v. Lute

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Feb 15, 2013
1:13-CV-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2013)
Case details for

Spruill v. Lute

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM SPRUILL, Plaintiff, v. CO LUTE, ET AL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Feb 15, 2013

Citations

1:13-CV-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 15, 2013)