From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprueill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 26, 2013
1:12CV208 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013)

Opinion

1:12CV208 1:10CR381-1

04-26-2013

LARRY JOSEPH SPRUEILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.


ORDER

On March 28, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge's Order and Recommendation was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner filed objections to the Recommendation within the time limit prescribed by Section 636.

The Court has reviewed the parties' submissions de novo and finds they do not change the substance of the United States Magistrate Judge's rulings which are affirmed and adopted.

Petitioner's motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Doc. # 12) is DENIED, Petitioner's "Emergency Petition for Relief from Judgment" (Doc. # 24) is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.

N. Carlton Tilley , Jr.

Senior United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sprueill v. United States

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
Apr 26, 2013
1:12CV208 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013)
Case details for

Sprueill v. United States

Case Details

Full title:LARRY JOSEPH SPRUEILL, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA

Date published: Apr 26, 2013

Citations

1:12CV208 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 26, 2013)