From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprowles v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Bowling Green
Oct 20, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-59-JHM (W.D. Ky. Oct. 20, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-59-JHM.

October 20, 2011

James H. Barr, Assistant U.S. Attorney, Louisville, Ky.


ORDER


The court has conducted a de novo review of the Magistrate Judge's report in light of the objections filed by the Commissioner and the record as a whole. The Magistrate Judge's report is adopted in part but not the findings and recommendation that the case be remanded for further proceedings.

The court finds that the decision of the Commissioner comports with the proper legal standards and is supported by substantial evidence. It is therefore ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sprowles v. Astrue

United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Bowling Green
Oct 20, 2011
Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-59-JHM (W.D. Ky. Oct. 20, 2011)
Case details for

Sprowles v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DANNY SPROWLES Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Kentucky, at Bowling Green

Date published: Oct 20, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:11-CV-59-JHM (W.D. Ky. Oct. 20, 2011)