From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprouse v. Sprouse

Supreme Court of Texas
Aug 29, 2002
92 S.W.3d 502 (Tex. 2002)

Opinion

No. 01-0752.

Opinion Delivered: August 29, 2002.

On Petition for Review from the Court of Appeals for the Fourteenth District of Texas.

William Liddell, Houston, for Petitioner.

Steven A. Sinkin, Karen L. Marvel, Sinkin Barretto, P.L.L.C., San Antonio, for Respondent.


This case involves an important question — whether the dormancy provisions in Texas Civil Practice Remedies Code sections 31.006 and 34.001 apply to past-due child support payments. We explicitly reserved this question in In re A.D., 73 S.W.3d 244, 249 (Tex. 2002). But because of the state of this record, we decline to decide the question here. The petition is denied.


Summaries of

Sprouse v. Sprouse

Supreme Court of Texas
Aug 29, 2002
92 S.W.3d 502 (Tex. 2002)
Case details for

Sprouse v. Sprouse

Case Details

Full title:Jesse Richard Sprouse, Petitioner, v. Patricia Ann Sprouse, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Texas

Date published: Aug 29, 2002

Citations

92 S.W.3d 502 (Tex. 2002)

Citing Cases

Isaacs v. Isaacs

See Overton v. Overton, No. 14-09-00865-CV, 2011 WL 398046, at *3-4 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] Feb. 8,…

In re the Interest of E.D

The question of whether these dormancy provisions apply to past-due child support was explicitly reserved in…