From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sproul v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01504-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01504-REB-MEH

10-18-2011

JAMES SPROUL, Plaintiff, v. KENNAN J. VANCE, D.O., Defendant.


MINUTE ORDER

Entered by Michael E. Hegarty , United States Magistrate Judge, on October 18, 2011.

Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Clarification or, Alternatively, Motion for Extension of Deadline to Designate Non-Parties at Fault [filed October 13, 2011; docket #15] is granted in part and denied as moot in part. The Court will clarify that it understood the parties had agreed to the proposed language concerning the deadline for designation of non-parties. Therefore, the Court kept the language in the Scheduling Order and added an alternative deadline for all other situations under which the parties may seek to join parties or amend pleadings (hence, the word "otherwise").

Defendant's alternative request for relief is denied as moot.


Summaries of

Sproul v. Vance

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Oct 18, 2011
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01504-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)
Case details for

Sproul v. Vance

Case Details

Full title:JAMES SPROUL, Plaintiff, v. KENNAN J. VANCE, D.O., Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Oct 18, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01504-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Oct. 18, 2011)