From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. Schilling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2007
241 F. App'x 968 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-7086.

Submitted: September 11, 2007.

Decided: September 17, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District Judge. (7:07-cv-00335-GEC).

David Frank Sprinkle, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


David Frank Sprinkle appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sprinkle v. Schilling, No. 7:07-cv-00335-gec, 2007 WL 2048924 (W.D.Va. July 11, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. Schilling

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Sep 17, 2007
241 F. App'x 968 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. Schilling

Case Details

Full title:David Frank SPRINKLE, Plaintiff — Appellant, v. Fred SCHILLING, Director…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Sep 17, 2007

Citations

241 F. App'x 968 (4th Cir. 2007)