From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P.

August 17, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 2, 2006, this court filed findings and recommendations recommending that defendants' May 10, 2005 motion for summary judgment be granted. By order filed March 31, 2006, the district court declined to adopt the findings and recommendations and remanded the matter to this court for further proceedings consistent with that order.

After review of the record, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants' May 10, 2005 motion for summary judgment is denied;

2. Each party is granted thirty days from the date of this order to file, as appropriate, a motion for summary judgment accompanied by all evidence relevant to disposition of such motion.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 17, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:MARK WAYNE SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 17, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2006)