From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)

Opinion

No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P.

February 28, 2006


ORDER


Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 3, 2005, plaintiff filed a pretrial statement and motion for production of an incarcerated witness. On August 3, 2005, the court vacated the pretrial conference and trial dates in light of defendants' motion for summary judgment. Pretrial conference and trial dates will be re-set in a separate order and until that time plaintiff's motion for production of an incarcerated witness is premature. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 3, 2005 motion for production of an incarcerated witness is denied without prejudice.


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. Robinson

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 28, 2006
No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. Robinson

Case Details

Full title:Mark Wayne Sprinkle, Plaintiff, v. Leon Robinson, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 28, 2006

Citations

No. CIV S-02-1563 LKK PAN P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 28, 2006)