From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprinkle v. AMZ Mfg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-0902 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-0902

12-06-2012

LOUIS SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. AMZ MANUFACTURING, et al., Defendants


(Judge Conner)


ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of the motion (Doc. 25) to withdraw Defendants AMZ Manufacturing Corp., EPY Industries, Inc., Boxwood Manufacturing Corp., and St. Paul Street Associates, Inc.'s summary judgment motion (Doc. 19), and the court recognizing that, "[u]nless a different time is set by [the court], a party may file a motion for summary judgment at any time until 30 days after the close of discovery[,]" see Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 56(b), and the court noting that the dispositive motion deadline in the captioned case is January 3, 2013, see (Doc. 2) granting the parties' joint motion for extension of the discovery deadline, therefore, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion to withdraw (Doc. 25) is GRANTED; and
2. The pending summary judgment motion (Doc. 19) is deemed WITHDRAWN.

___________

CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Sprinkle v. AMZ Mfg.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 6, 2012
Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-0902 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Sprinkle v. AMZ Mfg.

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS SPRINKLE, Plaintiff, v. AMZ MANUFACTURING, et al., Defendants

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 6, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 1:12-CV-0902 (M.D. Pa. Dec. 6, 2012)