From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 15, 1992
204 Ga. App. 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

holding that new business with “no track record of profitability” was not entitled to recover lost profits as to a breach-of-contract claim

Summary of this case from EZ Green Assoc's. v. Ga.-Pac. Corp.

Opinion

A92A0262.

DECIDED MAY 15, 1992.

Action on account. Fulton State Court. Before Judge Hill.

Glass, McCullough, Sherrill Harrold, R. Phillip Shinall III, James E. Dearing, Jr., for appellant.

Sutherland, Asbill Brennan, Charles T. Lester, Jr., Dulaney L. O'Roark III, for appellee.


Plaintiff Hall China Company filed suit against defendant Spring Well Dispensers, Inc., to collect an unpaid balance on a commercial account. Defendant answered and filed a counterclaim alleging it was damaged by plaintiff's breach of contract to supply defendant's demand for porcelain water dispensers manufactured by plaintiff to defendant's specifications. The trial court granted plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and dismissed the counterclaim. Defendant appeals the dismissal of its counterclaim.

We agree with defendant that the record contains evidence creating an issue of fact on its claim that plaintiff breached its agreement to supply defendant's demand for product. But the trial court did not err in dismissing the counterclaim because in answer to discovery requests the defendant indicated its only claim for damages was for lost profits and the only evidence of lost profits presented by defendant was too remote and speculative to sustain an award. Where, as here, the evidence shows the claimant was a new business with no history of profits and, in fact, was operating at a loss, the loss of prospective profits due to a breach of a supply contract is too remote and speculative to support a recovery of damages. See Radlo of Ga. v. Little, 129 Ga. App. 530 (2) ( 199 S.E.2d 835) (1973). Despite the evidence of the profit defendant made per unit sold to its customers, no evidence was produced, as requested by the plaintiff, of orders or contracts which defendant was unable to fill due to plaintiff's alleged failure to ship the product to defendant. Despite the efforts of the defendant's expert witness to estimate lost sales and calculate the total profits lost, defendant "was not entitled to recover lost profits because it had no track record of profitability." Empire Shoe Co. v. NICO Indus., 197 Ga. App. 411, 414 (2) ( 398 S.E.2d 440) (1990).

Judgment affirmed. Carley, P. J., and Johnson, J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 15, 1992.


Summaries of

Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 15, 1992
204 Ga. App. 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)

holding that new business with “no track record of profitability” was not entitled to recover lost profits as to a breach-of-contract claim

Summary of this case from EZ Green Assoc's. v. Ga.-Pac. Corp.

holding that new business with “no track record of profitability” was not entitled to recover lost profits as to a breach-of-contract claim

Summary of this case from EZ Green Assocs., LLC v. Ga.-Pac. Corp.
Case details for

Springwell Dispensers, Inc. v. Hall China Company

Case Details

Full title:SPRINGWELL DISPENSERS, INC. v. HALL CHINA COMPANY

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 15, 1992

Citations

204 Ga. App. 245 (Ga. Ct. App. 1992)
419 S.E.2d 112

Citing Cases

Interstate Dev. Serv. of Lake Park, Ga. v. Patel

[Cit.]" Springwell Dispensers v. Hall China Co., 204 Ga. App. 245, 246 ( 419 S.E.2d 112) (1992). Patel's…

Western Pub. Co., Inc. v. Mindgames, Inc.

As noted earlier, some states still accept the "New Business Rule" as a per se measure to completely prevent…