From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springfield v. Axlex

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-0336 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0336 KJN P

12-13-2021

CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. D. AXLEX, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on plaintiff's complaint raising First and Eighth Amendment violations by defendants Valencia, Barrow, and Cannizzaro at California Medical Facility, and defendants Axlex, Hobbs, Cook, Laughlin, Azuari, Peters and Cassesi at Mule Creek State Prison. (ECF No. 1.) During the December 7, 2021 settlement conference, this case did not settle. Therefore, the stay is lifted, and defendants are directed to file a responsive pleading.

Earlier, on March 18, 2021, the court ordered the United States Marshal to serve the complaint on defendants. Process directed to defendant L. Cannizzaro was returned unserved because CDCR cannot locate or identify the named defendant. Therefore, plaintiff must provide additional information to serve this defendant. Plaintiff shall promptly seek such information through discovery, the California Public Records Act, Calif. Gov't. Code § 6250, et seq., or other means available to plaintiff. If access to the required information is denied or unreasonably delayed, plaintiff may seek judicial intervention. Plaintiff is cautioned that failure to promptly and diligently seek the identity of such defendant may result in a recommendation that such defendant be dismissed. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The stay of this action (ECF No. 29) is lifted;

2. Within thirty days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a responsive pleading;

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send to plaintiff one USM-285 form, along with an instruction sheet and a copy of the complaint filed February 22, 2021;

4. Within sixty days from the date of this order, plaintiff shall complete and submit the attached Notice of Submission of Documents to the court, with the following document: one completed USM-285 form for defendant L. Cannizzaro, or show good cause why he cannot provide such information.

NOTICE OF SUBMISSION OF DOCUMENTS

Plaintiff hereby submits the following documents in compliance with the court's order filed December __, 2021.

___ completed USM-285 form


Summaries of

Springfield v. Axlex

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 13, 2021
2:21-cv-0336 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)
Case details for

Springfield v. Axlex

Case Details

Full title:CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. D. AXLEX, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 13, 2021

Citations

2:21-cv-0336 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 13, 2021)