From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Springfield v. Atascadero State Hosp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 25, 2024
CV 23-03749 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)

Opinion

CV 23-03749 MEMF (KS)

09-25-2024

WAYNE ROMANO SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

MAAME EWUSI-MENSAH FRIMPONG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the First Amended Complaint, Defendant Black's Motion to Dismiss, the February 29, 2024 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (“Report”), and all records herein. The time for filing Objections to the Report has passed and no Objections have been filed with the Court. Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) Defendant Black's Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the remainder of this action without prejudice for Plaintiff's failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) and under Local Rules 7-12 and 41-6.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Springfield v. Atascadero State Hosp.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 25, 2024
CV 23-03749 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)
Case details for

Springfield v. Atascadero State Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:WAYNE ROMANO SPRINGFIELD, Plaintiff, v. ATASCADERO STATE HOSPITAL, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 25, 2024

Citations

CV 23-03749 MEMF (KS) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 25, 2024)