Opinion
2019-1542
03-03-2020
SETH OSTROW, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTONIO PAPAGEORGIOU, SARAH PFEIFFER. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN; KEYNA T. CHOW, East Palo Alto, CA; ASIM BHANSALI, Kwun Bhansali Lazarus LLP, San Francisco, CA.
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2017-01653.
JUDGMENT
SETH OSTROW, Meister Seelig & Fein LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant. Also represented by ANTONIO PAPAGEORGIOU, SARAH PFEIFFER. DOUGLAS HALLWARD-DRIEMEIER, Ropes & Gray LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by SCOTT ANTHONY MCKEOWN; KEYNA T. CHOW, East Palo Alto, CA; ASIM BHANSALI, Kwun Bhansali Lazarus LLP, San Francisco, CA. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (WALLACH, MAYER, and STOLL, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
March 3, 2020
Date
/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner
Peter R. Marksteiner
Clerk of Court