Opinion
S. F. Nos. 6754, 6755, 6756. In Bank.
June 28, 1916.
APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. J.M. Seawell, Judge.
The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Spreckels v. Spreckels, ante, p. 775.
Charles S. Wheeler, John F. Bowie, Cushing Cushing, and Nathan M. Moran, for Appellants.
Morrison, Dunne Brobeck, for Respondents.
Fitzgerald, Abbott Beardsley, Amici Curiae.
The questions presented on these appeals are all determined in the opinion rendered in case No. 6753, Spreckels v. Spreckels, ante, p. 775, this day decided. All of the actions had the same purpose and object and are based upon the same allegations. The last three actions were begun to avoid technical objections and doubts as to the proper parties to maintain the action. As we have decided that the actions are not maintainable at all, the question as to the parties in interest is immaterial.
The judgment in each of the above-entitled cases is affirmed.
Rehearing denied.