From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprayberry v. Anderson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division
Jan 6, 2023
2:22-CV-00116-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-CV-00116-JRG-RSP

01-06-2023

MANCEL SPRAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ROGER W. ANDERSON, ET AL., Defendant.


ORDER

RODNEY GILSTRAP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants Roger W. Anderson and Darah Lyn Eckert previously filed motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 5 & 7). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 13), recommending that the motions be granted. Because no objections have been filed and because of the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation, the Recommendation is ADOPTED. A final judgment will issue separately.

So ORDERED


Summaries of

Sprayberry v. Anderson

United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division
Jan 6, 2023
2:22-CV-00116-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2023)
Case details for

Sprayberry v. Anderson

Case Details

Full title:MANCEL SPRAYBERRY, Plaintiff, v. ROGER W. ANDERSON, ET AL., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Texas, Marshall Division

Date published: Jan 6, 2023

Citations

2:22-CV-00116-JRG-RSP (E.D. Tex. Jan. 6, 2023)