From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spratt v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 26, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15CV607-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:15CV607-HEH

01-26-2016

KENNETH LAMAR SPRATT, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent.


MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing 28 U.S.C § 2241 Petition Without Prejudice)

Petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Court informed Petitioner that he must keep the Court informed of his current address. On January 11, 2016, the United States Postal Service returned a December 22, 2015 Memorandum Order to the Court marked, "RETURN TO SENDER" and "NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED" because Petitioner apparently has relocated. Since that date Petitioner has not provided the Court with a current address. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

/s/_________

HENRY E. HUDSON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Date: Jan. 26, 2016
Richmond, Virginia


Summaries of

Spratt v. Wilson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division
Jan 26, 2016
Civil Action No. 3:15CV607-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)
Case details for

Spratt v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH LAMAR SPRATT, Petitioner, v. ERIC D. WILSON, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

Date published: Jan 26, 2016

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:15CV607-HEH (E.D. Va. Jan. 26, 2016)

Citing Cases

Murray v. Bessemer Lumber Co.

Goodwyn Ross, of Bessemer, for appellant. An agent may not represent principals whose interests are adverse.…

Louisville N. R. Co. v. Bashinsky, Case Co.

The burden of proving agency was upon the plaintiffs. Jackson v. Ga. F. I. Co., 189 Ala. 495, 66 So. 588,…