From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spratt v. Ravarino Freschi, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 70637.

November 26, 1996.

APPEAL FROM THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION.

Harry J. Nichols, St. Louis, for Claimant/Appellant.

Todd D. Hilliker, Allison N. Bartle, Assistant Attorney General, St. Louis, Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Jefferson City, for Employer-Respondent.

Before DOWD, P.J., and REINHARD and GARY M. GAERTNER, JJ.


ORDER


Pauline Spratt appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's affirmance of the Administrative Law Judge's decision finding that she was only partially disabled and not entitled to benefits from the second injury fund. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Spratt v. Ravarino Freschi, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Nov 26, 1996
934 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Spratt v. Ravarino Freschi, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:PAULINE SPRATT, CLAIMANT/APPELLANT, v. RAVARINO FRESCHI, INC.…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Nov 26, 1996

Citations

934 S.W.2d 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)