From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spratt v. Leinster

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 26, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01526-WDM-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 26, 2007)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01526-WDM-MEH.

July 26, 2007


MINUTE ORDER


Pending before the Court is Defendant Roy Edward Leinster's Motion Pursuant to Florida Statute 768.79 [filed July 12, 2007; Doc #145]. The Motion is denied without prejudice. Until any dispute over proper jurisdiction is resolved, the within action is governed by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, as well as the applicable Colorado state statutes over pendant state claims. As Defendant's Motion appears to assert an Offer of Judgment, the Defendant is directed to review Fed.R.Civ.P. 68, and may re-file his pleading in accordance therewith. In addition, the Defendant is reminded that he must comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A when filing motions in this Court.


Summaries of

Spratt v. Leinster

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Jul 26, 2007
Civil Action No. 06-cv-01526-WDM-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 26, 2007)
Case details for

Spratt v. Leinster

Case Details

Full title:JAMES W. SPRATT, III, and INER GAMA, S.A., Plaintiffs, v. ROY EDWARD…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Jul 26, 2007

Citations

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01526-WDM-MEH (D. Colo. Jul. 26, 2007)