From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spratlin v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 13, 2024
3:23-cv-123-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Mar. 13, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-123-TES-MSH

03-13-2024

NATALIE SPRATLIN, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

PETER D. LEARY UNITED STATES ATTORNEY By: Ealy Ko Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration Pennsylvania Bar No. 314381 Office of Program Litigation, Office 5 Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration


PETER D. LEARY

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY

By: Ealy Ko

Ealy Ko is an attorney for the Social Security Administration who has been appointed to serve as a Special Assistant United States Attorney for the Middle District of Georgia in this case.

Special Assistant United States Attorney

Social Security Administration

Pennsylvania Bar No. 314381

Office of Program Litigation, Office 5

Office of the General Counsel

Social Security Administration

ORDER

HONORABLE TILMAN E. SELF, III., UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Defendant's unopposed motion to remand this case to the Commissioner for further action under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Upon consideration of the motion, and the memorandum in support thereof, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED that the decision of the Commissioner is hereby reversed under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and this case is hereby remanded.

On remand, the Administrative Law Judge will give further consideration to the claimant's alleged symptoms; further consideration to the persuasiveness of the opinion evidence from medical sources Raheem Robertson, M.D., Dipal Patel, M.D., and consultative examiner Richard Bank, Psy.D.; reconsider the claimant's maximum residual functional capacity; and if warranted, obtain supplemental evidence from a vocational expert to clarify the effects of the assessed limitations on the occupational base. The Administrative Law Judge will also offer the claimant the opportunity for a hearing; take further action to complete the administrative record; and issue a new decision.

Therefore, the Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89 (1991). The clerk of the Court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spratlin v. O'Malley

United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia
Mar 13, 2024
3:23-cv-123-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Mar. 13, 2024)
Case details for

Spratlin v. O'Malley

Case Details

Full title:NATALIE SPRATLIN, Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Georgia

Date published: Mar 13, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-123-TES-MSH (M.D. Ga. Mar. 13, 2024)