Opinion
23-cv-1235 (KMM/DJF)
08-18-2023
Susan Spraker, Petitioner, v. Michael Segal, Warden, Respondent.
ORDER
Katherine Menendez United States District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the May 9, 2023 Report and Recommendation (R&R) of United States Magistrate Judge Dulce J. Foster, which recommends that Susan Spraker's habeas petition be denied. [Dkt. 3.] Ms. Spraker has not filed any objections to the R&R in the time period permitted, or otherwise.
The Court reviews de novo any portion of the R&R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). In the absence of objections, the Court reviews the R&R for clear error. Nur v. Olmsted County, 563 F.Supp.3d 946, 949 (D. Minn. 2021) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) and Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996) (per curiam)). Based on the Court's careful review of the R&R and the record in this case, Judge Foster's R&R contains no error.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R [Dkt. 3] is ACCEPTED, the petition [Dkt. 1] is DENIED, and this action is DISMISSED.
Let Judgment be entered accordingly.