From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sprague v. Zeck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 12, 1937
194 A. 904 (Pa. 1937)

Opinion

September 28, 1937.

November 12, 1937.

Before KEPHART, C. J., SCHAFFER, MAXEY, DREW, LINN and STERN, JJ.

Appeal, No. 105, March T., 1937, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1934, No. 1519, in case of Frank Sprague v. H. J. Zeck et al. Judgment affirmed.

Trespass for personal injuries. Before GRAY, J.

Verdict and judgment for plaintiff against defendant in sum of $3,000. Defendant appealed.

Error assigned, among others, was refusal of judgment n. o. v.

John H. Sorg, for appellant.

John E. Evans, Jr., of Margiotti, Pugliese, Evans Buckley, for appellee.


Argued September 28, 1937.


We are of one mind that the evidence in this record demonstrates that the questions of negligence and contributory negligence were for the jury. Nothing would he gained by a detailed recital of the facts, as that is all the motion for judgment n. o. v. calls for.

Judgment affirmed.


Summaries of

Sprague v. Zeck

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Nov 12, 1937
194 A. 904 (Pa. 1937)
Case details for

Sprague v. Zeck

Case Details

Full title:Sprague v. Zeck, Appellant, et al

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 12, 1937

Citations

194 A. 904 (Pa. 1937)
327 Pa. 592

Citing Cases

Stranko v. Sugerman

He is within his rights in so doing, if he is reasonably satisfied that no danger is apparent and the same…

McKniff v. Wilson

He is within his rights in so doing, if he is reasonably satisfied that no danger is apparent and the same…