Opinion
Argued May 18, 1932 —
Decided October 17, 1932.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 9 N.J. Mis. R. 305.
For the respondent, Geran, Matlack Lautman.
For the appellants, Walter Carson.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion filed in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — TRENCHARD, LLOYD, CASE, DONGES, BROGAN, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, DEAR, WELLS, KERNEY, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.