Arrow, Edelstein Gross v. Rosco Productions, 581 F.Supp. 520 (S.D.N.Y. 1984) (Cannella, J.). In Sprafkin v. Pacific Industries, Inc., 30 A.D.2d 650, 291 N.Y.S.2d 174, 175 (1st Dep't 1968), the court affirmed a grant of summary judgment in an action by an attorney who sued in quantum meruit for legal services rendered to a client, where the client denied neither hiring the attorney nor the attorney's performing services, but merely denied knowledge of the extent of the attorney's services or their value. The facts here present an even stronger case than Sprafkin v. Pacific Industries, Inc., since Aronoff was informed by Kramer Levin what services were rendered and their value.