From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spradley v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 29, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 1141-TC (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 6:11 CV 1141-TC

11-29-2012

JOHN L. SPRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Magistrate Judge Coffin filed his Findings and Recommendation on October 22, 2012. The matter is now before me. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). No objections have been timely filed. This relieves me of my obligation to give the factual findings de novo review. Lorin Corp. v. Goto & Co., Ltd., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (9th Cir. 1982). See also Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo. I find no error.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, I adopt Judge Coffin's Findings and Recommendation.

________

Ann Aiken, United States District Judge


Summaries of

Spradley v. Oregon

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Nov 29, 2012
Case No. 6:11 CV 1141-TC (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Spradley v. Oregon

Case Details

Full title:JOHN L. SPRADLEY, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF OREGON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Nov 29, 2012

Citations

Case No. 6:11 CV 1141-TC (D. Or. Nov. 29, 2012)