From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Sportvision, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media L.P.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 7, 2022
18-CV-03025 (PGG) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2022)

Opinion

18-CV-03025 (PGG) (VF)

09-07-2022

SPORTVISION, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P., Defendant.


ORDER

VALERIE FIGUEREDO, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE:

On January 14, 2022, Plaintiffs filed a letter motion to compel Defendant to produce, among other things, certain World Umpires' Association collective bargaining agreements (the “Agreements”). See ECF No. 286 at 19-20. At the August 19, 2022 hearing before this Court, Defendant was directed to submit the Agreements for in camera review.

Following review, the Court finds that the Agreements are not relevant to the claims at issue in this case, and specifically, do not reference PITCHf/x or the replacement system (TrackMan). Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion to compel production of these Agreements is DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Sportvision, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media L.P.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 7, 2022
18-CV-03025 (PGG) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2022)
Case details for

Sportvision, Inc. v. MLB Advanced Media L.P.

Case Details

Full title:SPORTVISION, INC. et al., Plaintiffs, v. MLB ADVANCED MEDIA, L.P.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 7, 2022

Citations

18-CV-03025 (PGG) (VF) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 7, 2022)