From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spolan v. Capua

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)

Opinion

October 2, 1959

Appeal from the Municipal Court of the City of New York, Borough of Brooklyn, LEWIS S. FLAGG, JR., J.

Maxwell Cohen for appellant.

Santo W. Crupe and Joseph V. Costa for respondents.


The purported rental of additional garage space, as commercial space, in conjunction with the rental of the housing accommodations, was in effect the rental of a service in connection with the apartment ( Einhorn v. 100 E. 21st St. Garage, 278 App. Div. 848; Fromm v. Meyerowitz, 197 Misc. 271). The collection of a separate rental for said garage space without first obtaining authorization therefor from the Rent Administrator was an overcharge of rent ( Baum v. Crosfield, 279 App. Div. 1088).

The judgment should be unanimously reversed upon the law and facts, with $30 costs to plaintiff, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the sum of $356.50 plus $100 attorney's fees, with appropriate costs in the court below.

Concur — PETTE, HART and BROWN, JJ.

Judgment reversed, etc.


Summaries of

Spolan v. Capua

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department
Oct 2, 1959
19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
Case details for

Spolan v. Capua

Case Details

Full title:IRWIN SPOLAN, Appellant, v. ROCCO CAPUA et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, Second Department

Date published: Oct 2, 1959

Citations

19 Misc. 2d 782 (N.Y. App. Term 1959)
193 N.Y.S.2d 578

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Streg, Inc. v. Herman

While some tenants may not have availed themselves of the garage facilities, their failure to do so did not…