From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spohn v. Trinity Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0565 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0565 KJM CKD P

07-06-2012

PAUL N. SPOHN, Plaintiff, v. TRINITY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff has requested the appointment of counsel. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel will therefore be denied.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's request for the appointment of counsel (Docket No. 14) is denied.

____________________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
/kly
spoh0565.31(3)


Summaries of

Spohn v. Trinity Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 6, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0565 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)
Case details for

Spohn v. Trinity Cnty. Dist. Attorney's Office

Case Details

Full title:PAUL N. SPOHN, Plaintiff, v. TRINITY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, et…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 6, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0565 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 6, 2012)