From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 2, 2022
334 So. 3d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 3D21-1647

03-02-2022

Eric SPIVEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Eric Spivey, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.


Eric Spivey, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of Appellant's Motion for Rehearing, we grant rehearing and withdraw the opinion of January 26, 2022, consider Appellant's timely filed initial brief and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Affirmed. See Cregg v. State, 43 So. 3d 818, 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("When a consecutive sentence is pronounced, the defendant is not entitled to credit for time served on an antecedent sentence." (citing Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986) )).


Summaries of

Spivey v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Mar 2, 2022
334 So. 3d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Spivey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric SPIVEY, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

334 So. 3d 733 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)