From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivey v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Mar 2, 2022
No. 3D21-1647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)

Opinion

3D21-1647

03-02-2022

Eric Spivey, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Eric Spivey, in proper person. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.


Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, No. F12-7599 Mavel Ruiz, Judge.

Eric Spivey, in proper person.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before EMAS, GORDO and BOKOR, JJ.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of Appellant's Motion for Rehearing, we grant rehearing and withdraw the opinion of January 26, 2022, consider Appellant's timely filed initial brief and substitute the following opinion in its place.

Affirmed. See Cregg v. State, 43 So.3d 818, 821 (Fla. 1st DCA 2010) ("When a consecutive sentence is pronounced, the defendant is not entitled to credit for time served on an antecedent sentence." (citing Daniels v. State, 491 So.2d 543, 545 (Fla.1986))).


Summaries of

Spivey v. State

Florida Court of Appeals, Third District
Mar 2, 2022
No. 3D21-1647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Spivey v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eric Spivey, Appellant, v. The State of Florida, Appellee.

Court:Florida Court of Appeals, Third District

Date published: Mar 2, 2022

Citations

No. 3D21-1647 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Mar. 2, 2022)