From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivey v. Robertson

U.S.
Jun 12, 2000
530 U.S. 1229 (2000)

Summary

holding that CERCLA did not preempt Florida's nonclaim statute for filing claims against estates

Summary of this case from Calabrese v. McHugh

Opinion

No. 99-1639.

June 12, 2000.


C.A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 197 F. 3d 772.


Summaries of

Spivey v. Robertson

U.S.
Jun 12, 2000
530 U.S. 1229 (2000)

holding that CERCLA did not preempt Florida's nonclaim statute for filing claims against estates

Summary of this case from Calabrese v. McHugh

stating that courts may "not look beyond the face of the pleadings to determine whether relief should be granted based on the alleged facts"

Summary of this case from Nelson v. Sherron Assocs., Inc.
Case details for

Spivey v. Robertson

Case Details

Full title:SPIVEY ET UX., DBA THRIFTY INSTANT PRINT v. ROBERTSON ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Jun 12, 2000

Citations

530 U.S. 1229 (2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Halat

On July 17, 1997 the jury found Halat guilty of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to violate the…

Stangel v. Fetterly Gordon, P.A.

On a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss, the court accepts the plaintiffs' factual allegations as true. Buckley…