Opinion
March 25, 1999
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Joan Madden, J.).
Plaintiff's counsel, who claims that he was never told by the court, and never received notice from his calendar service, that the case had been marked off the trial calendar at a pretrial conference at which plaintiff was directed to submit to a further medical examination, has failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse in passively waiting for the announcement of a trial date for three and a half years without making any kind of inquiry as to the case's status (see, Rodriguez v. Hercules Chem. Co., 228 A.D.2d 319). Defendant's choice not to conduct a further medical examination of plaintiff within the court-ordered time frame, which was very early on in this three and a half-year period, does not excuse plaintiff's subsequent inordinate delay. There being no indication of any litigation activity in the case since the day after the pretrial conference, when plaintiff forwarded certain medical information to defendant in compliance with directives made at the conference, to plaintiff's making of the instant motion three and a half years later, the action was properly dismissed pursuant to CPLR 3404 (see, 179 MacDougal Equities v. North Realty Co., 232 A.D.2d 280).
Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Wallach and Mazzarelli, JJ.