From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 1962
142 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1962)

Opinion

No. 31310.

May 31, 1962.

Robert E. Sheridan of Gurney, Gurney Handley, Orlando, for petitioner.

Jack C. Inman of Berson, Barnes Inman, Orlando, Burnis T. Coleman and Paul E. Speh, Tallahassee, for respondents.


Rule 3.16(e), 31 F.S.A., (Attorney's Fees) provides "Where attorney's fees are allowable by law for services in the appellate court the request therefor shall be presented by motion filed with the clerk of the appellate court at or before the time of filing the party's first brief, and shall be disposed of at the time the case is disposed of on the merits, unless otherwise ordered by the court." (Emphasis added)

In this case the first brief was filed July 5, 1961, argument heard on November 10, 1961, and decided February 21, 1962. Now at this late date, May 4, 1962, Petition has been presented for attorneys' fees for services rendered in the presentation of the matter before this court. Obviously, this is a flagrant violation of the Florida Appellate Rule hereinabove quoted, and therefore the Petition is denied.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C.J., and DREW, O'CONNELL and HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SCOTT, C.J., concur.


Summaries of

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 1962
142 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1962)
Case details for

Spivey v. Battaglia Fruit Company

Case Details

Full title:FRANKIE SPIVEY, PETITIONER, v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY, INC., AND FLORIDA…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 31, 1962

Citations

142 So. 2d 3 (Fla. 1962)

Citing Cases

Rutkin v. State Farm Mutual Auto. Ins. Co.

Rutkin failed to comply with the italicized portion of the rule. Observance of the rule is obligatory upon a…