From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spivak v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1949
275 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

October 10, 1949.


Action to recover real estate brokerage. Judgment for defendant, on dismissal of the complaint at the close of plaintiff's case, reversed on the law and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. Plaintiff's proof was sufficient to warrant recovery on the ground that she was the procuring cause of the sale which resulted from the agreement, on terms, between the agent of defendant and the purchaser. Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Mac Crate, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Spivak v. McMahon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 10, 1949
275 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Spivak v. McMahon

Case Details

Full title:EDYTH SPIVAK, Appellant, v. VEGA P. McMAHON, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 10, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 1051 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)