From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 28, 2017
893 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 2017)

Opinion

SC: 155568

04-28-2017

Alexander R. SPITZER, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION, Defendant.


Order

On order of the Chief Justice, the motion of respondent attorney to extend the time for filing an answer to the complaint for superintending control is GRANTED. The answer will be accepted as timely filed if submitted on or before May 9, 2017.


Summaries of

Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Supreme Court of Michigan.
Apr 28, 2017
893 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 2017)
Case details for

Spitzer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:Alexander R. SPITZER, Plaintiff, v. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION…

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan.

Date published: Apr 28, 2017

Citations

893 N.W.2d 88 (Mich. 2017)