From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spitler v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-258-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Sep. 13, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. 2:10-cv-258-FtM-29DNF.

September 13, 2011


OPINION AND ORDER


This matter is before the Court on consideration of Magistrate Judge Douglas N. Frazier's Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19), filed on August 24, 2011, recommending that the Commissioner's decision to deny social security disability benefits be affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded to the Commissioner. No objections have been filed, and the time to do so has expired.

The Court reviews the Commissioner's decision to determine if it is supported by substantial evidence and based upon proper legal standards. Crawford v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 363 F.3d 1155, 1158 (11th Cir. 2004). Substantial evidence is more than a scintilla but less than a preponderance, and is such relevant evidence as a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. Moore v. Barnhart, 405 F.3d 1208, 1211 (11th Cir. 2005); Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158. Even if the evidence preponderates against the Commissioner's findings, the Court must affirm if the decision reached is supported by substantial evidence. Crawford, 363 F.3d at 1158-59. The Court does not decide facts anew, make credibility judgments, reweigh the evidence, or substitute its judgment for that of the Commissioner. Moore, 405 F.3d at 1211;Dyer v. Barnhart, 395 F.3d 1206, 1210 (11th Cir. 2005). The magistrate judge, district judge and appellate judges all apply the same legal standards to the review of the Commissioner's decision. Dyer, 395 F.3d at 1210; Shinn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 391 F.3d 1276, 1282 (11th Cir. 2004); Phillips v. Barnhart, 357 F.3d 1232, 1240 n. 8 (11th Cir. 2004). After an independent review, the Court agrees with the findings and recommendations in the Report and Recommendation.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. #19) is accepted and adopted.

2. The Decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner of Social Security pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) so that the Commissioner can consider the treating physicians' report from the Family Health Centers, and take such further actions as are necessary to properly resolve the matter.

3. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file.

DONE AND ORDERED at Fort Myers, Florida.


Summaries of

Spitler v. Astrue

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division
Sep 13, 2011
Case No. 2:10-cv-258-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Sep. 13, 2011)
Case details for

Spitler v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ROXANNE SPITLER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Fort Myers Division

Date published: Sep 13, 2011

Citations

Case No. 2:10-cv-258-FtM-29DNF (M.D. Fla. Sep. 13, 2011)