From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spinner v. 1725 York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 2008
56 A.D.3d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4576.

November 18, 2008.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered April 22, 2008, which, to the extent appealed from, denied defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Fabiani Cohen Hall, LLP, New York (Lisa A. Sokoloff of counsel), for appellants.

Ginsberg Broome, P.C., New York (Alvin H. Broome of counsel), for respondents.

Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.


The evidence that rain had been falling for an hour and a half before plaintiff slipped and fell and that persons entering the building were carrying, and sometimes closing, umbrellas in view of the doormen for at least 40 minutes raises a triable issue whether defendants had actual or constructive notice of a dangerously wet and slippery condition in the lobby of their building ( see Fortgang v Chase Manhattan Bank, 23 NY2d 895; Hewett v Conway Stores, 266 AD2d 137).

We have considered defendants' remaining contention and find it unavailing.

[ See 2008 NY Slip Op 31150(U).]


Summaries of

Spinner v. 1725 York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 18, 2008
56 A.D.3d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
Case details for

Spinner v. 1725 York

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES SPINNER et al., Respondents, v. 1725 YORK OWNERS CORP. et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 18, 2008

Citations

56 A.D.3d 324 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 8983
869 N.Y.S.2d 12

Citing Cases

Lansen v. SL Green Realty Corp.

Other issues raised by Green Realty about whether the imperfection in the sidewalk is trivial" or not and…

Lansen v. SL Green Realty Corp.

Other issues raised by Green Realty about whether the imperfection in the sidewalk is trivial” or not and…