From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spinnell v. Seldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1295.

June 12, 2007.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Donna M. Mills, J.), entered November 17, 2006, upon a jury verdict, awarding plaintiff damages, and bringing up for review an order, same court (Judith J. Gische, J.), entered May 11, 2006, which, inter alia, denied defendant's cross motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeal from the May 11, 2006 order, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

Sweetbaum Sweetbaum, Lake Success (Marshall D. Sweetbaum of counsel), for appellant.

Andrew J. Spinnell, New York, respondent pro se.

Before: Sullivan, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Catterson and Kavanagh, JJ.


Clear and convincing evidence supports the verdict finding that defendant, in documents sent by him to lawyers and other professionals with whom plaintiff conducted business and from whom he received referrals, made statements about plaintiff that were false and defamatory. The documents contained assertions that plaintiff, an attorney, had engaged in tax fraud, had submitted forged or falsified documents to a United States District Court, and had been found unfit to be a judge ( see Dillon v City of New York, 261 AD2d 34, 38). Although the statement that plaintiff had been found to have committed "egregious ethical misconduct," should have been deemed nonactionable as an expression of opinion based on the disclosed circumstance that plaintiff had, in fact, been reprimanded by a Grievance Committee in Connecticut, in light of the number of other properly submitted statements, and in view of their egregious nature, we perceive no ground to disturb the $100,000 award of compensatory damages and $400,000 award of punitive damages ( see Rosenberg, Mine Armstrong v Mallilo Grossman, 39 AD3d 335).

We have considered defendant's other arguments and find them unavailing.


Summaries of

Spinnell v. Seldon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 12, 2007
41 A.D.3d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Spinnell v. Seldon

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW J. SPINNELL, Respondent, v. PHILIP SELDON, Individually and Under…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 12, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 170 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5146
841 N.Y.S.2d 2

Citing Cases

General Credit Corp. v. Guidice

Punitive damages must be proved by clear and convincing evidence or a preponderance of the evidence.…

Edwin R. v. Maria G.

Should the parties be unable to reach a mutual agreement on visitation, either may file a petition to enforce…