From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spink v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Jun 30, 2015
465 S.W.3d 75 (E.D. Mo. 2015)

Opinion

No. ED 102119

06-30-2015

Kerri D. Spink, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam Rowley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.


Gwenda Renee Robinson, Missouri Public Defender Office, St. Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Chris Koster, Attorney General, Adam Rowley, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Patricia L. Cohen, P.J., Roy L. Richter, J., and Robert M. Clayton III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kerri D. Spink appeals the judgment denying her Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Spink v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.
Jun 30, 2015
465 S.W.3d 75 (E.D. Mo. 2015)
Case details for

Spink v. State

Case Details

Full title:Kerri D. Spink, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR.

Date published: Jun 30, 2015

Citations

465 S.W.3d 75 (E.D. Mo. 2015)