From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2012
451 F. App'x 954 (Fed. Cir. 2012)

Opinion

2011-1170

01-12-2012

STRYKER SPINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH and DEPUY SPINE, INC., Defendants-Appellees.

WILLIAM L. MENTLIK, Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, of Westfield, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief were ROY H. WEPNER and KEITH E. GILMAN. Of counsel was STEVEN J. ROUTH, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC.


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in No. 08-CV-1827, Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly.

JUDGMENT

WILLIAM L. MENTLIK, Lerner David Littenberg Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, of Westfield, New Jersey, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief were ROY H. WEPNER and KEITH E. GILMAN. Of counsel was STEVEN J. ROUTH, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, of Washington, DC.

LUKE L. DAUCHOT, Kirkland & Ellis LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for defendants-appellees. Of counsel on the brief were GREGORY A. CASTANIAS, Jones Day, of Washington, DC; and CALVIN P. GRIFFITH, PATRICK J. NORTON, and SUSAN M. GERGER, of Cleveland, Ohio. Of counsel was BARRY E. BRETSCHNEIDER, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, of McLean, Virginia.

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE and LINN, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

________

Jan horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jan 12, 2012
451 F. App'x 954 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Case details for

Stryker Spine v. Biedermann Motech GmbH

Case Details

Full title:STRYKER SPINE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH and DEPUY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jan 12, 2012

Citations

451 F. App'x 954 (Fed. Cir. 2012)