From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spindler v. Johnson & Johnson Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case No. CV-10-1414-JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)

Opinion

Case No. CV-10-1414-JSW

10-25-2011

BARTON SPINDLER, DEBORAH UNDERWOOD, VALERIE BURKS, and PARVIS KAVEH, by and through his guardian ad litem MITRA KAVEH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated Plaintiffs, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON CORP., OMNICARE, INC., and DOES 1-10., Inclusive. Defendants.

Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871) Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Mark E. Haddad (SBN 205945) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Richard D. Raskin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP Counsel for Defendant Johnson & Johnson Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page


Samuel R. Miller (SBN 66871)

Ryan M. Sandrock (SBN 251781)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Mark E. Haddad (SBN 205945)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Richard D. Raskin (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

Counsel for Defendant Johnson & Johnson

Additional Counsel Listed on Signature Page

Hon. Jeffrey S. White


DEFENDANTS' APPLICATION FOR

ENTRY OF ORDER OF DISMISSAL

PURSUANT TO THE COURT'S AUGUST

1, 2011 ORDER AND [PROPOSED]

ORDER

WHEREAS, the Court's August 1, 2011 Order (Dkt. No. 87) (the "Order") granted the motions of Defendants Johnson & Johnson ("J & J") and Omnicare, Inc. ("Omnicare") (collectively, "Defendants") to dismiss the Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") filed by Plaintiffs Barton Spindler, Deborah Underwood, Valerie Burks, and Parvis Kaveh ("Plaintiffs").

WHEREAS, the Order granted Plaintiffs leave to amend, stating that "Plaintiffs shall file their amended complaint, if any, within twenty days of the date of this Order."

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs did not file any amended complaint within twenty days of the date of the Order (August 22, 2011).

NOW, THEREFORE, Defendants respectfully request that this action be dismissed with prejudice. The Order (page 8, lines 14-15), states that "If the plaintiffs do not amend their complaint, this action will be dismissed without prejudice." However, in context, the Court may have meant "with prejudice." Thus, in the attached proposed Order, this issue is left for the Court.

Respectfully Submitted,

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: Samuel R. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant Johnson & Johnson

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP

By: Aldo A. Badini

Attorneys for Defendant Omnicare, Inc.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION

Pursuant to General Order No. 45(X)(B), I hereby attest that I have on file written permission to sign this joint motion from all parties whose signatures are indicated by a conformed signature (/s/) within this e-filed document.

SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP

By: Samuel R. Miller

Attorneys for Defendant Johnson & Johnson

Additional Counsel

Aldo A. Badini (SBN 257086)

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP

Harvey Kurzweil (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

Eamon O'Kelly (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)

DEWEY & LEBOEUF LLP

Counsel for Defendant Omnicare, Inc.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court hereby dismisses the action brought by Plaintiffs [with prejudice] [without projudico].

IT IS SO ORDERED.

THE HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Spindler v. Johnson & Johnson Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
Oct 25, 2011
Case No. CV-10-1414-JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)
Case details for

Spindler v. Johnson & Johnson Corp.

Case Details

Full title:BARTON SPINDLER, DEBORAH UNDERWOOD, VALERIE BURKS, and PARVIS KAVEH, by…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

Date published: Oct 25, 2011

Citations

Case No. CV-10-1414-JSW (N.D. Cal. Oct. 25, 2011)