From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Spiller v. Chrisman

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 14, 2024
24-cv-12148 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-12148

11-14-2024

HAKIM SPILLER, Plaintiff, v. TROY CHRISMAN, et al., Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO CORRECT DEFICIENCY

F. Kay Behm United States District Judge.

Before the Court is Petitioner Hakim Spiller's civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff is currently incarcerated at the Saginaw Correctional Facility in Freeland, Michigan. For the reasons stated below, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice.

On August 26, 2024, Chief Magistrate Judge David R. Grand signed an order of deficiency in this case because Plaintiff had neither paid the filing fee nor moved to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 3.) The order required Plaintiff to file the proper documents or pay the filing fee within thirty days. (Id.) The order cautioned that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the case for want of prosecution. (Id.)

A prisoner who wishes to proceed without prepayment of fees and costs in a civil complaint in federal court must file an affidavit of indigency and a certified copy of his prison trust fund account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a).

Plaintiff has submitted an application to proceed without prepayment of fees (ECF No. 4) but has not submitted a certified trust account statement. If an incarcerated person who does not pay the full filing fee fails to provide a certified trust account statement, the district court must notify them of the deficiency, and the incarcerated person will then have thirty days to correct the error or to pay the full filing fee. Erby v. Kula, 113 Fed.Appx. 74, 75-76 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing McGore v. Wrigglesworth, 114 F.3d 601, 605 (6th Cir. 1997)). If the prisoner does not correct the deficiency, “‘the district court must presume that the prisoner is not a pauper,' assess the full filing fee, and dismiss the case for want of prosecution.” Id. at 76 (citing McGore, 114 F.3d at 605). By not providing the documentation needed to proceed in forma pauperis or submitting the filing and administrative fees, Plaintiff failed to comply with the deficiency order.

Accordingly, the complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Plaintiff may file a new civil rights complaint under a new case number provided that he pays the filing and administrative fees or files the necessary documentation to proceed without prepayment of fees.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Spiller v. Chrisman

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Nov 14, 2024
24-cv-12148 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Spiller v. Chrisman

Case Details

Full title:HAKIM SPILLER, Plaintiff, v. TROY CHRISMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Nov 14, 2024

Citations

24-cv-12148 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 14, 2024)